Website review, no card needed
trestique.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202632 issues · 86 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on trestique.com, 12 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83B- #22,623 of 97,513 reviewed websitesbeats 72%
- #14,393 of 53,081 online storesbeats 66%
- #13,939 of 48,127 Shopify storesbeats 64%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 154 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.7 s
2.6 s
3.4 s
4.3 s
5.2 s
6.0 s
6.9 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 808 KiBAbout 808 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.0 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.
Main-thread work: 5.1 s
A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 192 KiB18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (192 KiB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (rebuyengine.com, Klaviyo and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.6 MB and 534 ms of main-thread time.
1,988 HTML elements
The page has 1,988 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
rebuyengine.com adds 121 ms
121 msrebuyengine.com costs a phone 121 ms of main-thread work and 300 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 110 ms
110 msKlaviyo costs a phone 110 ms of main-thread work and 321 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
LoyaltyLion adds 54 ms
54 msLoyaltyLion costs a phone 54 ms of main-thread work and 364 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 92 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 92 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 171 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
30 ms · 81 KiBAbout 81 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 30 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
94 KiB10 images could be 94 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify JavaScript
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 25 ms
25 msYour server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 21.4 s
21.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.5 s
8.5 sYour largest element takes 8.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “image description”.
Speed Index: 9.1 s
9.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 391 ms
391 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 391 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 146 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 137 ms
137 msReal visitors wait 137 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 528 ms
528 msReal visitors wait 528 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.0 MB in 378 requests
4.0 MBYour homepage downloads 4.0 MB in 378 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (125), images 903 KiB (97) and other files 877 KiB (129). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.14 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.14 g of CO₂e: 136.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
15 tap targets too small
15 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
5 images without alt text
5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (23 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 8 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (71 characters)
Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “All-in-One Makeup Kits in The Palm of Your Hand | Trestique – trèStiQue”.
324 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 324 pages on trestique.com and 5 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 158 characters
Your meta description is 158 characters: “Simplify your makeup routine with Trestique’s travel-friendly kits, mascara & concealer. Lightweight, cruelty-free, and…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.trestique.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.trestique.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (904 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.trestique.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages without an H1
https://www.trestique.com/collections/all-makeup-products, https://www.trestique.com/collections/essential-kits, https://www.trestique.com/collections/makeup-refills and https://www.trestique.com/collections/all-refills have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 43 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
27 small tap targets
27 of 110 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Requests the notification permission on page load
Requests the notification permission on page load.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
About 589 words of copy
The homepage carries about 589 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP ALL” and “SHOP NOW”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Shop All”, “SHOP NOW” and “Shop NOW”.
9 short forms
9 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 143 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Fathom.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
28 cookies set on arrival
28Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
58 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 58 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at trestique.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on trestique.com, including 15 speed issues and 2 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.