Website review, no card needed

tresemme.in logo

tresemme.in website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202643 issues · 96 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on tresemme.in, 15 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.8 sMay 16Oct 312.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Oct 31, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
236 ms168 msMay 16Oct 31222 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026177 ms
May 23, 2026176 ms
May 30, 2026178 ms
Jun 6, 2026182 ms
Jun 13, 2026187 ms
Jun 20, 2026191 ms
Jun 27, 2026193 ms
Jul 4, 2026194 ms
Jul 11, 2026192 ms
Jul 18, 2026192 ms
Jul 25, 2026189 ms
Aug 1, 2026190 ms
Aug 8, 2026194 ms
Aug 15, 2026198 ms
Aug 22, 2026205 ms
Aug 29, 2026210 ms
Sep 5, 2026213 ms
Sep 12, 2026216 ms
Sep 19, 2026221 ms
Sep 26, 2026223 ms
Oct 3, 2026226 ms
Oct 10, 2026228 ms
Oct 17, 2026227 ms
Oct 24, 2026225 ms
Oct 31, 2026222 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tresemme.in (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tresemme.in at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. tresemme.in at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. tresemme.in at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. tresemme.in at 3.8 s3.8 s
  5. tresemme.in at 4.7 s4.7 s
  6. tresemme.in at 5.7 s5.7 s
  7. tresemme.in at 6.6 s6.6 s
  8. tresemme.in at 7.6 s7.6 s

Speed

12 to fix60
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • 7,525 HTML elements

    The page has 7,525 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 6.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and epsilondelta.co and others), adding 1.9 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 545 ms

    545 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 545 ms of main-thread work and 686 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    578 KiB

    About 578 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    574 KiB

    31 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (574 KiB).

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 432 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 328 ms

    328 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 328 ms of main-thread work and 312 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • epsilondelta.co adds 267 ms

    267 ms

    epsilondelta.co costs a phone 267 ms of main-thread work and 39 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Shopify adds 192 ms

    192 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 192 ms of main-thread work and 358 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 41 ms

    41 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 41 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.6 s

    22.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 219 ms

    219 ms

    Real visitors wait 219 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 177 ms to 222 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Your largest element takes 4.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 9 images without width and height

    9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 646 ms

    646 ms

    Real visitors wait 646 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.068

    0.068

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.068, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 3.5 MB in 280 requests

    3.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 280 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (77), other files 725 KiB (115) and images 434 KiB (48). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    TSM_NewWebsiteBanner_BPrange_480x360_224b8746-8b7d-472a-98a2 is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (66 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.00 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.00 g of CO₂e: 119.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 6784
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    2 dropdowns have no label.

  • ARIA roles used must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA roles used must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 62 images without alt text

    62 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (17 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 64 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 12 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Meta description is long (174 characters)

    Your meta description is 174 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 436 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 436 pages on tresemme.in and 12 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Buy Best Hair Care & Hair Styling Products Online | TRESemmé”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tresemme.in/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: OnlineBusiness and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tresemme.in/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Parts of the site are closed to 5 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

3 checks passed
  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (4,137 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.tresemme.in/llms.txt (41 KiB, 240 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.tresemme.in/collections/all has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 104 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    6 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 4688
  • 3 third-party cookies

    3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 5 low-resolution images

    5 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    92 of 94 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 770 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 770 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “TRY ON STYLES!” and “Contact Us”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 57 testimonial or review blocks and 58 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Clarity and Hotjar.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 36 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 36 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tresemme.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 6 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Instafeed · Judge Me Reviews · Wizzy Search Filters · Ecomsend Popups · sharethis.com · nfcube.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on tresemme.in, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25