Website review, no card needed
trips-group.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202625 issues · 74 checks
This review found 25 issues worth fixing on trips-group.com, 13 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 91 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 103 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.6 s
3.2 s
4.8 s
6.4 s
8.0 s
9.6 s
11.2 s
12.7 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
4.3 s57 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.3 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.4 s · 302 KiBAbout 302 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 72). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 147 KiBAbout 147 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
400 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).
Main-thread work: 2.1 s
A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 473 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 79 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
25 KiB25 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (gtmrkt.com and Google Fonts), adding 3 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.
1 checks passed
Server response: 240 ms
240 msYour server sent the HTML in 240 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.9 s
6.9 sReal visitors wait 6.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 5.0 s
5.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.1 s
15.1 sYour largest element takes 15.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “engineering future solutions Unsere Vision von Fortschritt,…”. Most of its time is resource load delay (9.7 s).
Speed Index: 18.6 s
18.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 15.3 s
15.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.3 s
4.3 sThe first text or image appears after 4.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 61% slower for real visitors
+61%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 4.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 91 ms to 103 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.073
0.073The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.073, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 29 ms
29 msScripts block the page for only 29 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.9 MB in 122 requests
2.9 MBYour homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 122 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (9), scripts 656 KiB (51) and fonts 583 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.82 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.82 g of CO₂e: 98.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
14 text elements with low contrast
14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (70 characters)
Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “TRIPS group I Process and Factory Automation I Industrial IT Solutions”.
171 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 171 pages on trips-group.com and 10 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Die TRIPS group ist Ihr Partner für innovative Technologien, Automation & Digitalisierung. Tradition trifft Innovation …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Die TRIPS groupautomatisiert an 4 StandortenProjekte für Kunden in der ganzen Welt”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.trips-group.com/de/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.trips-group.com/de/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,162 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.trips-group.com/llms.txt (60 KiB, 278 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
6 pages slow to respond
https://www.trips-group.com/de/industrial-it-solutions, https://www.trips-group.com/de/energy-management, https://www.trips-group.com/de/substation-automation, https://www.trips-group.com/de/schutztechnik, https://www.trips-group.com/de/netzberechnung and https://www.trips-group.com/de/industrial-it-security took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 53 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
6 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 6 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
15 small tap targets
15 of 48 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,275 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,275 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 4 email links.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at trips-group.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 25 issues on trips-group.com, including 15 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.