Website review, no card needed

ttspl.in logo

ttspl.in website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202645 issues · 87 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on ttspl.in, 14 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.9 sMay 2Oct 173.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.2 s
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.3 s
Jul 11, 20263.3 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
131 ms97 msMay 2Oct 17124 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026115 ms
May 9, 2026118 ms
May 16, 2026123 ms
May 23, 2026117 ms
May 30, 2026122 ms
Jun 6, 2026122 ms
Jun 13, 2026120 ms
Jun 20, 2026122 ms
Jun 27, 2026127 ms
Jul 4, 2026116 ms
Jul 11, 2026119 ms
Jul 18, 2026125 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026123 ms
Aug 8, 2026111 ms
Aug 15, 2026107 ms
Aug 22, 2026104 ms
Aug 29, 2026101 ms
Sep 5, 2026102 ms
Sep 12, 2026102 ms
Sep 19, 2026110 ms
Sep 26, 2026113 ms
Oct 3, 2026115 ms
Oct 10, 2026127 ms
Oct 17, 2026124 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ttspl.in (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ttspl.in at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. ttspl.in at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. ttspl.in at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. ttspl.in at 4.5 s4.5 s
  5. ttspl.in at 5.7 s5.7 s
  6. ttspl.in at 6.8 s6.8 s
  7. ttspl.in at 7.9 s7.9 s
  8. ttspl.in at 9.1 s9.1 s

Speed

10 to fix45
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.1 s · 662 KiB

    About 662 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.7 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.

  • Font display

    1.6 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.6 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 73). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    400 ms · 618 KiB

    35 images could be 618 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.4 MB and 736 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 262 KiB

    132 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (262 KiB).

  • Google CDN adds 418 ms

    418 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 418 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 277 ms

    277 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 277 ms of main-thread work and 469 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 73 KiB

    About 73 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 167 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 15 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 15 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 73 but mobile only 45. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.36

    0.36

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.36 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.2 s

    16.2 s

    Your largest element takes 16.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.6 s

    16.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.9 s

    10.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.251

    0.251

    The layout shifts by 0.251 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors wait 3.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 54 images without width and height

    54 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 218 ms

    218 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 218 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 124 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 120 ms

    120 ms

    Real visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 3.5 MB in 160 requests

    3.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 160 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (37), images 1.3 MB (87) and other files 352 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 18 images below the first screen load straight away

    18 images further down the page (722 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    76 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example LCL-and-FCL-scaled.jpg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 300 px. Resized copies would save about 76 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (42 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.00 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.00 g of CO₂e: 120.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8388
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 97 images without alt text

    97 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (25 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 25 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (10 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (10 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 92100
  • 46 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 46 pages on ttspl.in and 9 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 115 characters

    Your meta description is 115 characters: “Total Transport is a leading logistics company in India, delivering reliable and expert global logistics solutions.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The Power of People and Technology That Makes Us a Leading Logistics Company in India”.

  • Title: 52 characters

    Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Leading Logistics Company in India | Total Transport”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ttspl.in/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ttspl.in/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.ttspl.in/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (829 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

6 to fix69
  • 7 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.ttspl.in/2026/10, https://www.ttspl.in/2026/09, https://www.ttspl.in/2026/08, https://www.ttspl.in/2026/06, https://www.ttspl.in/2025/10 and https://www.ttspl.in/2025/02 and 1 other are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.ttspl.in/logistics-services and https://www.ttspl.in/what-we-do all use the title “Best Logistics Services | Total Transport”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 13 pages without a meta description

    https://www.ttspl.in/who-we-are, https://www.ttspl.in/investor-relation, https://www.ttspl.in/disclosure-under-regulation-46-and-62-of-sebi-regulations, https://www.ttspl.in/blogs, https://www.ttspl.in/contact-us and https://www.ttspl.in/request-a-quote and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.ttspl.in/logistics-services and https://www.ttspl.in/what-we-do use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.ttspl.in/what-we-do, whose canonical is https://www.ttspl.in/logistics-services. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 9 pages without an H1

    https://www.ttspl.in/disclosure-under-regulation-46-and-62-of-sebi-regulations, https://www.ttspl.in/blogs, https://www.ttspl.in/2026/10, https://www.ttspl.in/2026/09, https://www.ttspl.in/2026/08 and https://www.ttspl.in/2026/06 and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 18 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 1 small tap target

    1 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page is smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 19 distorted images

    19 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 905 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 905 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “SIGNUP/LOGIN”, “CONTACT US” and “Request a Quote”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks and 12 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 3 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ttspl.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2017.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on ttspl.in, including 22 speed issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25