Website review, no card needed
tupperware.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202647 issues · 85 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on tupperware.com.br, 18 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71C- #77,141 of 95,244 reviewed websitesbeats 16%
- #45,016 of 51,305 online storesbeats 10%
- #41,593 of 46,417 Shopify storesbeats 8%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 230 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.8 s
2.7 s
3.6 s
4.5 s
5.4 s
6.3 s
7.2 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.8 s · 1.5 MB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).
Improve image delivery
5.5 s · 1.2 MB5 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Main-thread work: 5.6 s
A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,766 HTML elements
The page has 3,766 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 492 KiBAbout 492 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, handtalk.me and ascbrazil.com.br and others), adding 2.9 MB and 878 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 146 KiBAbout 146 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
550 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).
Shopify adds 466 ms
466 msShopify costs a phone 466 ms of main-thread work and 761 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
ascbrazil.com.br adds 71 ms
71 msascbrazil.com.br costs a phone 71 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
handtalk.me adds 150 ms
150 mshandtalk.me costs a phone 150 ms of main-thread work and 412 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 169 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 17 KiB17 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
36 KiB36 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
32 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 20 ms
20 msYour server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.4 s
16.4 sYour largest element takes 16.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 22.8 s
22.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.5 s
8.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 345 ms
345 msReal visitors wait 345 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 35% slower for real visitors
+35%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 168 ms to 230 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 295 ms
295 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 295 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 541 ms
541 msReal visitors wait 541 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.029
0.029The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.029, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.2 MB in 411 requests
6.2 MBYour homepage downloads 6.2 MB in 411 requests on a phone: images 2.2 MB (24), other files 1.6 MB (259) and scripts 1.4 MB (98). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
chat_imagem_flutuante_20260731114341.png weighs 1,017 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images far larger than shown
1.2 MB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example chat_imagem_flutuante_20260731114341.png at 1,254 px wide, shown at 30 px. Resized copies would save about 1.2 MB.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
simone-mendes-mobile.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image in older formats
1 image (1,017 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.75 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.75 g of CO₂e: 210.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Hidden but focusable
27 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
13 text elements with low contrast
13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (23 characters)
Your title is only 23 characters: “Tupperware Loja Oficial”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
289 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 289 pages on tupperware.com.br and 18 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “Bem-vindo à Tupperware Brasil! Garrafas, potes herméticos, organizadores e utensílios para facilitar sua rotina com qua…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Loja Oficial Tupperware”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tupperware.com.br/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tupperware.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,601 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.tupperware.com.br/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.tupperware.com.br/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.tupperware.com.br/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
8 pages without a meta description
https://www.tupperware.com.br/pages/sobre-a-empresa, https://www.tupperware.com.br/pages/encontre-um-consultor, https://www.tupperware.com.br/pages/vitrine-digital, https://www.tupperware.com.br/customer_authentication/redirect, https://www.tupperware.com.br/collections/ofertas and https://www.tupperware.com.br/collections/geladeira and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.tupperware.com.br/products/travessa-tupperware%C2%AE-vitrea-retangular-ii-650ml-350992556, whose canonical is https://www.tupperware.com.br/products/travessa-tupperware%c2%ae-vitrea-retangular-ii-650ml-350992556. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.tupperware.com.br/pages/sobre-a-empresa, https://www.tupperware.com.br/pages/encontre-um-consultor, https://www.tupperware.com.br/pages/vitrine-digital, https://www.tupperware.com.br/customer_authentication/redirect, https://www.tupperware.com.br/collections/ofertas and https://www.tupperware.com.br/collections and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 142 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Array(1)”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
195 of 199 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 612 words of copy
The homepage carries about 612 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
60 short forms
60 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 89 testimonial or review blocks and 1 customer or partner logo.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
20 cookies set on arrival
20Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
30 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tupperware.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 10 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Consentmo Gdpr · Judge Me Reviews · Boost Ai Search Filter · Ta Banner Pop Up · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Gdpr Backpack · Pagbrasil App Companion · Swym Wishlist Plus · amazonaws.com · tupperware.com.br
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on tupperware.com.br, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.