Website review, no card needed
tusdata.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202644 issues · 88 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on tusdata.com, 24 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 100 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 100 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 100 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 100 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.1 s
3.2 s
4.2 s
5.3 s
6.3 s
7.4 s
8.5 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
17.6 s · 6.1 MB24 images could be 6.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 17.6 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
8.0 s · 3.3 MB36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.3 MB).
Render-blocking requests
4.2 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 140 KiBAbout 140 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.1 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).
Mobile performance score: 34
34/100Your mobile performance score is 34 (desktop: 44). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 162 KiBAbout 162 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
300 ms · 25 KiB25 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, JSDelivr CDN and Google Fonts and others), adding 327 KiB and 221 ms of main-thread time.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 100 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.6 s
A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 414 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 151 ms
151 msYour server sent the HTML in 151 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.60
0.60For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.60 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 35.8 s
35.8 sYour largest element takes 35.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 36.8 s
36.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 36.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.078
1.078The layout shifts by 1.078 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 13.4 s
13.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sThe first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 100 ms to 100 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 99 ms
99 msReal visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 549 ms
549 msReal visitors wait 549 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 65 ms
65 msScripts block the page for only 65 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.8 MB in 73 requests
8.8 MBYour homepage downloads 8.8 MB in 73 requests on a phone: images 7.6 MB (37), fonts 640 KiB (10) and scripts 378 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 3.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
8 images far larger than shown
1,000 KiB8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example mobile-05-20260917142439.png at 1,200 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1,000 KiB.
12 images in older formats
12 images (4.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
mobile-05-20260917142439.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit
2.50 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.50 g of CO₂e: 300.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
14 images without alt text
14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h5 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (7 characters)
Your title is only 7 characters: “TUSDATA”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (177 characters)
Your meta description is 177 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
67 internal links, 171 external
The homepage links to 67 pages on tusdata.com and 171 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tusdata.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tusdata.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.tusdata.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,018 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://www.tusdata.com/nasil-soru-yakaliyoruz-arsivi declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
3 pages share a title
https://www.tusdata.com/kamp-seciniz, https://www.tusdata.com/canli-ve-online-kamplarimiz-kamp-kategorisi-36 and https://www.tusdata.com/online-kamplarimiz-kamp-kategorisi-35 all use the title “Eğitimlerimiz | TUSDATA”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.tusdata.com/kurumsal/hakkimizda-icerik-9 and https://www.tusdata.com/kurumsal/eski-tus-sinavlari-icerik-2516 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages share a meta description
https://www.tusdata.com/kamp-seciniz, https://www.tusdata.com/canli-ve-online-kamplarimiz-kamp-kategorisi-36 and https://www.tusdata.com/online-kamplarimiz-kamp-kategorisi-35 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 pages with very little text
https://www.tusdata.com/videolar and https://www.tusdata.com/nasil-soru-yakaliyoruz-arsivi have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 small tap targets
10 of 34 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 939 words of copy
The homepage carries about 939 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 13 testimonial or review blocks and 50 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tusdata.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on tusdata.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.