Website review, no card needed

tusdata.com logo

tusdata.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202644 issues · 88 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on tusdata.com, 24 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s920 msMay 2Oct 171.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.5 s
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.0 s
Aug 22, 20261.0 s
Aug 29, 20261.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.0 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
116 ms93 msMay 2Oct 17100 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026100 ms
May 9, 2026100 ms
May 16, 2026100 ms
May 23, 202696 ms
May 30, 202699 ms
Jun 6, 2026102 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 2026107 ms
Jun 27, 2026104 ms
Jul 4, 2026101 ms
Jul 11, 2026101 ms
Jul 18, 2026104 ms
Jul 25, 2026106 ms
Aug 1, 2026110 ms
Aug 8, 2026110 ms
Aug 15, 2026107 ms
Aug 22, 2026108 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026113 ms
Sep 12, 2026113 ms
Sep 19, 2026111 ms
Sep 26, 2026103 ms
Oct 3, 2026103 ms
Oct 10, 2026103 ms
Oct 17, 2026100 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tusdata.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tusdata.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. tusdata.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. tusdata.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  4. tusdata.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  5. tusdata.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  6. tusdata.com at 6.3 s6.3 s
  7. tusdata.com at 7.4 s7.4 s
  8. tusdata.com at 8.5 s8.5 s

Speed

8 to fix34
  • Improve image delivery

    17.6 s · 6.1 MB

    24 images could be 6.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 17.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    8.0 s · 3.3 MB

    36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.3 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.2 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 140 KiB

    About 140 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.1 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34 (desktop: 44). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 162 KiB

    About 162 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    300 ms · 25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, JSDelivr CDN and Google Fonts and others), adding 327 KiB and 221 ms of main-thread time.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 100 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 414 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 151 ms

    151 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 151 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.60

    0.60

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.60 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 35.8 s

    35.8 s

    Your largest element takes 35.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 36.8 s

    36.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 36.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.078

    1.078

    The layout shifts by 1.078 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 13.4 s

    13.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 100 ms to 100 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Real visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 549 ms

    549 ms

    Real visitors wait 549 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 65 ms

    65 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 65 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix14
  • Page weight: 8.8 MB in 73 requests

    8.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.8 MB in 73 requests on a phone: images 7.6 MB (37), fonts 640 KiB (10) and scripts 378 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 3.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    1,000 KiB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example mobile-05-20260917142439.png at 1,200 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1,000 KiB.

  • 12 images in older formats

    12 images (4.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    mobile-05-20260917142439.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.50 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.50 g of CO₂e: 300.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8186
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 14 images without alt text

    14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h5 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9274
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (7 characters)

    Your title is only 7 characters: “TUSDATA”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (177 characters)

    Your meta description is 177 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 67 internal links, 171 external

    The homepage links to 67 pages on tusdata.com and 171 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tusdata.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tusdata.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.tusdata.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,018 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix76
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.tusdata.com/nasil-soru-yakaliyoruz-arsivi declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 3 pages share a title

    https://www.tusdata.com/kamp-seciniz, https://www.tusdata.com/canli-ve-online-kamplarimiz-kamp-kategorisi-36 and https://www.tusdata.com/online-kamplarimiz-kamp-kategorisi-35 all use the title “Eğitimlerimiz | TUSDATA”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.tusdata.com/kurumsal/hakkimizda-icerik-9 and https://www.tusdata.com/kurumsal/eski-tus-sinavlari-icerik-2516 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://www.tusdata.com/kamp-seciniz, https://www.tusdata.com/canli-ve-online-kamplarimiz-kamp-kategorisi-36 and https://www.tusdata.com/online-kamplarimiz-kamp-kategorisi-35 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.tusdata.com/videolar and https://www.tusdata.com/nasil-soru-yakaliyoruz-arsivi have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 34 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix64
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 939 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 939 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 13 testimonial or review blocks and 50 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tusdata.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on tusdata.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25