Website review, no card needed

uady.mx logo

uady.mx website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202651 issues · 78 checks

This review found 51 issues worth fixing on uady.mx, 23 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.9 s3.2 sMay 9Oct 243.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.6 s
May 16, 20263.7 s
May 23, 20263.8 s
May 30, 20263.8 s
Jun 6, 20263.7 s
Jun 13, 20263.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.5 s
Jul 25, 20263.5 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20263.4 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.5 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Oct 24, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
250 ms198 msMay 9Oct 24244 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026218 ms
May 16, 2026220 ms
May 23, 2026220 ms
May 30, 2026232 ms
Jun 6, 2026236 ms
Jun 13, 2026228 ms
Jun 20, 2026225 ms
Jun 27, 2026209 ms
Jul 4, 2026204 ms
Jul 11, 2026211 ms
Jul 18, 2026218 ms
Jul 25, 2026225 ms
Aug 1, 2026227 ms
Aug 8, 2026229 ms
Aug 15, 2026238 ms
Aug 22, 2026238 ms
Aug 29, 2026243 ms
Sep 5, 2026244 ms
Sep 12, 2026237 ms
Sep 19, 2026236 ms
Sep 26, 2026230 ms
Oct 3, 2026229 ms
Oct 10, 2026233 ms
Oct 17, 2026232 ms
Oct 24, 2026244 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of uady.mx (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. uady.mx at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. uady.mx at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. uady.mx at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. uady.mx at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. uady.mx at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. uady.mx at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. uady.mx at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. uady.mx at 4.9 s4.9 s

Speed

10 to fix23
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.9 s · 3.2 MB

    37 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.2 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.6 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.5 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.5 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 23

    23/100

    Your mobile performance score is 23. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.5 MB

    9 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Twitter and Hotjar and others), adding 3.2 MB and 699 ms of main-thread time.

  • YouTube adds 537 ms

    537 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 537 ms of main-thread work and 973 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 347 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Azure Web Services adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Azure Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    163 KiB

    About 163 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.39

    0.39

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.39 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    Your largest element takes 15.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 35.1 s

    35.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.0 s

    10.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.525

    0.525

    The layout shifts by 0.525 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 948 ms

    948 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 948 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 898 ms

    898 ms

    Real visitors wait 898 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 218 ms to 244 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 196 ms

    196 ms

    Real visitors wait 196 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

3 to fix50
  • Page weight: 6.5 MB in 98 requests

    6.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 98 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (42), images 2.0 MB (15) and other files 1.6 MB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (631 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    89 KiB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20261029131244_IMG_2076_1136x757 inaug Feria de la Salud UAD at 1,136 px wide, shown at 351 px. Resized copies would save about 89 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (23 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.85 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.85 g of CO₂e: 222.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 7078
  • Images must have alternative text (8 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (2 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • <html> element must have a valid value for the lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a valid value for the lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 14 links without text

    14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Page language is “es_mx”

    The page declares lang=“es_mx”, which is not a usable language code, so screen readers and translation tools guess.

1 checks passed
  • 31 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 12 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9275
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://uady.mx/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 151 characters

    Your meta description is 151 characters: “Somos UADY, una institución educativa que promueve oportunidades de aprendizaje integral, a través de una educación hum…”.

  • Title: 31 characters

    Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 329 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://uady.mx/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7397
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    12 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 329 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 329 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at uady.mx, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Azure

Company

Founded
1922

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 51 issues on uady.mx, including 21 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25