Website review, no card needed
uady.mx website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202651 issues · 78 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on uady.mx, 23 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
59FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 218 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 220 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 220 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 244 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.9 s · 3.2 MB37 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.2 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.6 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.5 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.5 s).
Mobile performance score: 23
23/100Your mobile performance score is 23. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
1.5 MB9 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Twitter and Hotjar and others), adding 3.2 MB and 699 ms of main-thread time.
YouTube adds 537 ms
537 msYouTube costs a phone 537 ms of main-thread work and 973 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 347 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Azure Web Services adds 0 ms
0 msAzure Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
163 KiBAbout 163 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.39
0.39For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.39 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.1 s
15.1 sYour largest element takes 15.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 35.1 s
35.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.0 s
10.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.525
0.525The layout shifts by 0.525 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 948 ms
948 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 948 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 898 ms
898 msReal visitors wait 898 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 218 ms to 244 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 196 ms
196 msReal visitors wait 196 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.5 MB in 98 requests
6.5 MBYour homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 98 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (42), images 2.0 MB (15) and other files 1.6 MB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images in older formats
6 images (631 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
6 images far larger than shown
89 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20261029131244_IMG_2076_1136x757 inaug Feria de la Salud UAD at 1,136 px wide, shown at 351 px. Resized copies would save about 89 KiB.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (23 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.85 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.85 g of CO₂e: 222.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (8 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (2 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
<html> element must have a valid value for the lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a valid value for the lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
14 links without text
14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Page language is “es_mx”
The page declares lang=“es_mx”, which is not a usable language code, so screen readers and translation tools guess.
1 checks passed
31 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 12 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://uady.mx/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 151 characters
Your meta description is 151 characters: “Somos UADY, una institución educativa que promueve oportunidades de aprendizaje integral, a través de una educación hum…”.
Title: 31 characters
Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 329 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://uady.mx/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
12 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 329 words of copy
The homepage carries about 329 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at uady.mx, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Azure
Company
- Founded
- 1922
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on uady.mx, including 21 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.