Website review, no card needed

uchi.ru logo

uchi.ru website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202632 issues · 60 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on uchi.ru, 10 of them high impact, across 60 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s3.0 sMay 16Oct 313.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.4 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.4 s
Jun 6, 20263.4 s
Jun 13, 20263.5 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20263.5 s
Oct 31, 20263.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
308 ms206 msMay 16Oct 31233 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026261 ms
May 23, 2026261 ms
May 30, 2026263 ms
Jun 6, 2026268 ms
Jun 13, 2026277 ms
Jun 20, 2026295 ms
Jun 27, 2026296 ms
Jul 4, 2026296 ms
Jul 11, 2026294 ms
Jul 18, 2026290 ms
Jul 25, 2026287 ms
Aug 1, 2026280 ms
Aug 8, 2026275 ms
Aug 15, 2026271 ms
Aug 22, 2026270 ms
Aug 29, 2026268 ms
Sep 5, 2026261 ms
Sep 12, 2026247 ms
Sep 19, 2026229 ms
Sep 26, 2026220 ms
Oct 3, 2026218 ms
Oct 10, 2026218 ms
Oct 17, 2026221 ms
Oct 24, 2026227 ms
Oct 31, 2026233 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of uchi.ru (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. uchi.ru at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. uchi.ru at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. uchi.ru at 2.4 s2.4 s
  4. uchi.ru at 3.3 s3.3 s
  5. uchi.ru at 4.1 s4.1 s
  6. uchi.ru at 4.9 s4.9 s
  7. uchi.ru at 5.7 s5.7 s
  8. uchi.ru at 6.5 s6.5 s

Speed

6 to fix86
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 1.5 MB

    85 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).

  • Mobile performance score: 86

    86/100

    Your mobile performance score is 86. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    650 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    582 KiB

    About 582 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 376 ms

    376 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 376 ms of main-thread work and 624 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrica and mail.ru and others), adding 753 KiB and 453 ms of main-thread time.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 99 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    37 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 655 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 15.9 s

    15.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 23 images without width and height

    23 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Your largest element takes 2.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “C нами занимается каждый второй школьник страны Учи.ру — об…”. Most of its time is resource load delay (1.5 s).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

10 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 192 ms

    192 ms

    Real visitors wait 192 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 769 ms

    769 ms

    Real visitors wait 769 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 261 ms to 233 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 181 ms

    181 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 181 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.6 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.052

    0.052

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.052, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix67
  • Page weight: 2.4 MB in 125 requests

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 125 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (31), fonts 577 KiB (9) and images 202 KiB (51). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.68 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.68 g of CO₂e: 81.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fix68
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Positive tabindex

    6 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

SEO

10 to fixGoogle 8543
  • No page title

    Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.

  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://uchi.ru/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at uchi.ru/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

AI search readiness

1 to fix69
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://uchi.ru/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10092
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix25
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 0 words

    The homepage has only about 0 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

Privacy and tracking

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at uchi.ru, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Servicepipe Servicepipe Llc

Company

Founded
2012

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on uchi.ru, including 10 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25