Website review, no card needed

ucm.be logo

ucm.be website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202632 issues · 74 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on ucm.be, 18 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.1 s3.0 sMay 9Oct 243.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.3 s
May 16, 20263.4 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.5 s
Jun 6, 20263.6 s
Jun 13, 20263.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.8 s
Jul 4, 20263.9 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20263.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.7 s
Aug 15, 20263.7 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.7 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.6 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Oct 24, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
165 ms145 msMay 9Oct 24163 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026147 ms
May 16, 2026149 ms
May 23, 2026150 ms
May 30, 2026152 ms
Jun 6, 2026155 ms
Jun 13, 2026158 ms
Jun 20, 2026160 ms
Jun 27, 2026161 ms
Jul 4, 2026160 ms
Jul 11, 2026160 ms
Jul 18, 2026160 ms
Jul 25, 2026158 ms
Aug 1, 2026159 ms
Aug 8, 2026160 ms
Aug 15, 2026161 ms
Aug 22, 2026161 ms
Aug 29, 2026162 ms
Sep 5, 2026162 ms
Sep 12, 2026162 ms
Sep 19, 2026161 ms
Sep 26, 2026161 ms
Oct 3, 2026160 ms
Oct 10, 2026161 ms
Oct 17, 2026162 ms
Oct 24, 2026163 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ucm.be (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ucm.be at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. ucm.be at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. ucm.be at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. ucm.be at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. ucm.be at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. ucm.be at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. ucm.be at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. ucm.be at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

9 to fix48
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    8.2 s · 1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    7.2 s

    54 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 7.2 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.4 s · 528 KiB

    About 528 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 453 KiB

    80 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (453 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    600 ms · 142 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 142 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    550 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 419 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 391 KiB and 304 ms of main-thread time.

  • Document request latency

    44 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Minify JavaScript

    10 ms · 19 KiB

    19 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Improve image delivery

    18 KiB

    3 images could be 18 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 205 ms

    205 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 205 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 23.5 s

    23.5 s

    Your largest element takes 23.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “ENGAGER, combien ça COÛTE ? Je calcule le coût du premier t…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.1 s

    25.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.9 s

    14.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 804 ms

    804 ms

    Real visitors wait 804 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 338 ms

    338 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 338 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 147 ms to 163 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 145 ms

    145 ms

    Real visitors wait 145 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.03

    0.03

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.03, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.5 MB in 92 requests

    4.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 92 requests on a phone: scripts 2.7 MB (17), images 783 KiB (17) and stylesheets 632 KiB (42). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (22 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.27 g of CO₂e: 152.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8592
  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (7 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10085
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 158 characters

    Your meta description is 158 characters: “Indépendant, TPE et PME, UCM est à vos côtés pour réussir votre projet de société. Guichet d'entreprises - Caisses d'as…”.

  • Title: 37 characters

    Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “UCM, de toutes nos forces. Avec vous.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ucm.be/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ucm.be/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix75
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    1%

    A phone browser shows 752 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 10. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.ucm.be/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    28 of 32 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 752 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 752 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ucm.be, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Proximus Isp

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on ucm.be, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25