Website review, no card needed
unibas.it website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202634 issues · 77 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on unibas.it, 16 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 972 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 964 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 959 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 898 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 918 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 909 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 906 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 956 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 914 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 905 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 907 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 892 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 934 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 984 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 91 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 93 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 92 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 80 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.3 s
1.9 s
2.6 s
3.2 s
3.8 s
4.5 s
5.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
19.1 s · 9.7 MB46 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9.7 MB).
Improve image delivery
12.4 s · 2.7 MB11 images could be 2.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 12.4 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.8 s · 276 KiBAbout 276 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.0 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 2.0 s.
Mobile performance score: 39
39/100Your mobile performance score is 39. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 408 KiBAbout 408 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
ZenDesk adds 250 ms
250 msZenDesk costs a phone 250 ms of main-thread work and 428 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (ZenDesk and Accessibe Accessibility Overlay), adding 671 KiB and 365 ms of main-thread time.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 178 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
38 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.2 s
A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 580 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 295 ms
295 msYour server sent the HTML in 295 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 35.8 s
35.8 sYour largest element takes 35.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “img smartphone”.
Time to Interactive: 37.1 s
37.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 37.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.6 s
9.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.318
0.318The layout shifts by 0.318 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 933 ms
933 msReal visitors wait 933 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
41 images without width and height
41 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 309 ms
309 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 309 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 116 ms
116 msReal visitors wait 116 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 15% faster for real visitors
-15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 91 ms to 80 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 27% faster for real visitors
-27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.5 MB in 66 requests
10.5 MBYour homepage downloads 10.5 MB in 66 requests on a phone: images 9.3 MB (40), scripts 804 KiB (13) and stylesheets 295 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images over 500 KB
7 images weigh 6.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
12 images far larger than shown
1.6 MB12 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 5553_21_Slide-sito-768x3.png at 1,729 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.6 MB.
29 images in older formats
29 images (9.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (688 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.0 g of CO₂ per visit
2.98 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.98 g of CO₂e: 357.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 40 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
6 H1 headlines
There are 6 <h1> headlines (“Studiare in Unibas”, “In primo piano” and “Eventi e informazioni”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
143 internal links, 69 external
The homepage links to 143 pages on unibas.it and 69 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 105 characters
Your meta description is 105 characters: “Presentazione dell'ateneo, la didattica ed i corsi di laurea. Area studenti e bandi, norme e regolamenti.”.
Title: 39 characters
Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Universit� degli Studi della Basilicata”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://portale.unibas.it/contents/instance1/static/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://portale.unibas.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (805 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
14 pages without a meta description
https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/strumenti/servizi-on-line-personale.html, https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/strumenti/webmail-unibas.html, https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/ateneo/unibas-oggi.html, https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/ateneo/identita.html, https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/ateneo/missione-e-strategia.html and https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/ateneo/sedi.html and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page with very little text
https://portale.unibas.it/site/en/home.html has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 132 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
67 small tap targets
67 of 179 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 880 words of copy
The homepage carries about 880 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at unibas.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Regione Basilicata
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on unibas.it, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.