Website review, no card needed

unibas.it logo

unibas.it website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202634 issues · 77 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on unibas.it, 16 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s813 msMay 9Oct 241.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.4 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.0 s
Jul 18, 2026972 ms
Jul 25, 2026964 ms
Aug 1, 2026959 ms
Aug 8, 2026898 ms
Aug 15, 2026918 ms
Aug 22, 2026909 ms
Aug 29, 2026906 ms
Sep 5, 2026956 ms
Sep 12, 2026914 ms
Sep 19, 2026905 ms
Sep 26, 2026907 ms
Oct 3, 2026892 ms
Oct 10, 2026934 ms
Oct 17, 2026984 ms
Oct 24, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
96 ms72 msMay 9Oct 2480 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202691 ms
May 16, 202693 ms
May 23, 202692 ms
May 30, 202690 ms
Jun 6, 202692 ms
Jun 13, 202691 ms
Jun 20, 202688 ms
Jun 27, 202687 ms
Jul 4, 202683 ms
Jul 11, 202681 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202678 ms
Aug 1, 202679 ms
Aug 8, 202678 ms
Aug 15, 202678 ms
Aug 22, 202678 ms
Aug 29, 202675 ms
Sep 5, 202677 ms
Sep 12, 202677 ms
Sep 19, 202677 ms
Sep 26, 202676 ms
Oct 3, 202675 ms
Oct 10, 202677 ms
Oct 17, 202677 ms
Oct 24, 202680 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of unibas.it (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. unibas.it at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. unibas.it at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. unibas.it at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. unibas.it at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. unibas.it at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. unibas.it at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. unibas.it at 4.5 s4.5 s
  8. unibas.it at 5.1 s5.1 s

Speed

7 to fix39
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    19.1 s · 9.7 MB

    46 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9.7 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    12.4 s · 2.7 MB

    11 images could be 2.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 12.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.8 s · 276 KiB

    About 276 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.0 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 2.0 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 39

    39/100

    Your mobile performance score is 39. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 408 KiB

    About 408 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • ZenDesk adds 250 ms

    250 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 250 ms of main-thread work and 428 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (ZenDesk and Accessibe Accessibility Overlay), adding 671 KiB and 365 ms of main-thread time.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 178 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    38 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 580 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 295 ms

    295 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 295 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 35.8 s

    35.8 s

    Your largest element takes 35.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “img smartphone”.

  • Time to Interactive: 37.1 s

    37.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 37.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.6 s

    9.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.318

    0.318

    The layout shifts by 0.318 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 933 ms

    933 ms

    Real visitors wait 933 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 41 images without width and height

    41 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 309 ms

    309 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 309 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 116 ms

    116 ms

    Real visitors wait 116 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 91 ms to 80 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 27% faster for real visitors

    -27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 10.5 MB in 66 requests

    10.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.5 MB in 66 requests on a phone: images 9.3 MB (40), scripts 804 KiB (13) and stylesheets 295 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images over 500 KB

    7 images weigh 6.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 12 images far larger than shown

    1.6 MB

    12 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 5553_21_Slide-sito-768x3.png at 1,729 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.6 MB.

  • 29 images in older formats

    29 images (9.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 8 images below the first screen load straight away

    8 images further down the page (688 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.98 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.98 g of CO₂e: 357.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10099
  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 40 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10087
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“Studiare in Unibas”, “In primo piano” and “Eventi e informazioni”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 143 internal links, 69 external

    The homepage links to 143 pages on unibas.it and 69 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 105 characters

    Your meta description is 105 characters: “Presentazione dell'ateneo, la didattica ed i corsi di laurea. Area studenti e bandi, norme e regolamenti.”.

  • Title: 39 characters

    Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Universit� degli Studi della Basilicata”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://portale.unibas.it/contents/instance1/static/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://portale.unibas.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (805 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/strumenti/servizi-on-line-personale.html, https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/strumenti/webmail-unibas.html, https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/ateneo/unibas-oggi.html, https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/ateneo/identita.html, https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/ateneo/missione-e-strategia.html and https://portale.unibas.it/site/home/ateneo/sedi.html and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://portale.unibas.it/site/en/home.html has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 132 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9679
  • 67 small tap targets

    67 of 179 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 880 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 880 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at unibas.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Regione Basilicata

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on unibas.it, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25