Website review, no card needed
unionaire.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202649 issues · 87 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on unionaire.com, 26 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
58F- #99,623 of 101,374 reviewed websitesbeats 1%
- #55,773 of 56,075 online storesbeats 0%
- #2,325 of 2,348 WooCommerce storesbeats 1%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 6.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 7.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 6.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 7.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 7.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 471 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 461 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 466 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 473 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 493 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 528 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 555 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 568 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 582 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 581 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 580 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 592 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 619 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 650 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 677 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 698 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 702 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 670 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 644 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 637 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 649 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 684 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 727 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 778 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 804 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.7 s
3.4 s
5.1 s
6.8 s
8.5 s
10.2 s
11.9 s
13.6 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
6.3 s · 7.2 MB194 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.2 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.5 s · 4.0 MB16 images could be 4.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.1 s · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.6 s62 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.6 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s
1.2 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 1.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 22
22/100Your mobile performance score is 22 (desktop: 11). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.2 s
A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 2.9 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.
Font display
900 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 900 ms).
Facebook adds 389 ms
389 msFacebook costs a phone 389 ms of main-thread work and 426 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 377 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,292 HTML elements
The page has 2,292 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google CDN adds 80 ms
80 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 80 ms of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 49 KiBAbout 49 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
40 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
21 KiB21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 117 ms
117 msYour server sent the HTML in 117 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 7.0 s
7.0 sReal visitors wait 7.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.37
0.37For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.37 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 6.3 s
6.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 6.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors wait 4.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 20.1 s
20.1 sYour largest element takes 20.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “UNIONAIRE-&-Souhola-1000×1000”.
Speed Index: 18.8 s
18.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 44.8 s
44.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 44.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.9 s
5.9 sThe first text or image appears after 5.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.37
0.37The layout shifts by 0.37 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 601 ms
601 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 601 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 70% slower for real visitors
+70%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 471 ms to 804 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.2 s to 7.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.9 MB in 272 requests
9.9 MBYour homepage downloads 9.9 MB in 272 requests on a phone: images 6.1 MB (61), scripts 3.2 MB (95) and fonts 225 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images over 500 KB
5 images weigh 4.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
8 images in older formats
8 images (3.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (3.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images far larger than shown
182 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Installement-New-Banner-1000×1000.webp at 1,900 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 182 KiB.
About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit
2.79 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.79 g of CO₂e: 335.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
14 text elements with low contrast
14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
51 links without text
51 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (16 characters)
Your title is only 16 characters: “Home - Unionaire”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (370 characters)
Your meta description is 370 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
116 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 116 pages on unionaire.com and 5 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://unionaire.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://unionaire.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (937 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://unionaire.com/llms.txt (195 KiB, 510 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a meta description
https://unionaire.com/product-category/fans and https://unionaire.com/product-category/screens use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
6 pages without an H1
https://unionaire.com/ar, https://unionaire.com/help, https://unionaire.com/product-category/fans, https://unionaire.com/product-category/screens, https://unionaire.com/about-us and https://unionaire.com/contact-us have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://unionaire.com/ct has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
4 pages slow to respond
https://unionaire.com/ar, https://unionaire.com/help, https://unionaire.com/product-category/fans and https://unionaire.com/product-category/screens took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
8 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 8 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
55 small tap targets
55 of 120 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “e.jetStickySection is not a function o (https://unionaire.com/wp-content/plugins/jet-blocks/assets/js/jet-blocks.min.js…”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 666 words of copy
The homepage carries about 666 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
4 checks passed
15 calls to action
The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “Call Support : 19012”, “Track order” and “Contact us”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
28 cookies set on arrival
28Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
20 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at unionaire.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- OVHcloud
Company
- Founded
- 1995
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on unionaire.com, including 28 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.