Website review, no card needed
upim.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202653 issues · 109 checks
This review found 53 issues worth fixing on upim.com, 19 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65D- #74,596 of 80,638 reviewed websitesbeats 6%
- #38,204 of 39,668 online storesbeats 3%
- #204 of 257 Salesforce Commerce Cloud storesbeats 18%
Closest competitors among Salesforce Commerce Cloud stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 192 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 193 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 208 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.5 s
2.2 s
3.0 s
3.7 s
4.5 s
5.2 s
6.0 s
upim.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.6 s · 1.9 MB72 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.9 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.3 s · 853 KiBAbout 853 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.8 s · 380 KiBAbout 380 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (livestory.io, Google Tag Manager and Optanon and others), adding 4.5 MB and 984 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
870 KiB12 images could be 870 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
livestory.io adds 444 ms
444 mslivestory.io costs a phone 444 ms of main-thread work and 3.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 379 ms
379 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 379 ms of main-thread work and 365 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.9 s
A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,795 HTML elements
The page has 2,795 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 197 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 42 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 17 ms
17 msYour server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 52.4 s
52.4 sYour largest element takes 52.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “01_hero_carousel-bg_img1-mob”.
Speed Index: 21.5 s
21.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 21.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 52.9 s
52.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 52.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sThe first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 255 ms
255 msReal visitors wait 255 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 259 ms
259 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 259 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 192 ms to 208 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.1 MB in 155 requests
12.1 MBYour homepage downloads 12.1 MB in 155 requests on a phone: images 8.4 MB (66), scripts 1.5 MB (43) and media 1.4 MB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
23 images in older formats
23 images (6.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
22 images below the first screen load straight away
22 images further down the page (3.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.4 g of CO₂ per visit
3.44 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.44 g of CO₂e: 413.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Required ARIA attributes must be provided (1 element)
Required ARIA attributes must be provided: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
7 text elements with low contrast
7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Heading levels should only increase by one (4 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.
Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (1 element).
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (8 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 9 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (66 characters)
Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Upim - Abbigliamento Donna, Uomo e Bambini | Accessori per la Casa”.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
374 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 374 pages on upim.com and 10 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 118 characters
Your meta description is 118 characters: “Scopri le ultime Collezioni di Abbigliamento per Donna, Uomo e Bambini e sfoglia il catalogo di Accessori per la Casa.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.upim.com/it/it/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.upim.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,039 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to /s/Sites-upim-Site/dw/shared_session_redirect, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
7 linked pages hidden from search
/it/it/p/ls-upim-chi-siamo.html, /it/it/p/ls-upim-franchising.html, /it/it/p/ls-blukids-chi-siamo.html, /it/it/p/ls-blukids-franchising.html, /it/it/p/ls-croff-chi-siamo.html and /it/it/p/ls-croff-franchising.html and 1 other are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
6 pages share a title
/it/it/p/ls-upim-chi-siamo.html, /it/it/p/ls-upim-franchising.html, /it/it/p/ls-blukids-chi-siamo.html, /it/it/p/ls-blukids-franchising.html, /it/it/p/ls-croff-chi-siamo.html and /it/it/p/ls-croff-franchising.html all use the title “Page | UPIM”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
6 pages share a meta description
/it/it/p/ls-upim-chi-siamo.html, /it/it/p/ls-upim-franchising.html, /it/it/p/ls-blukids-chi-siamo.html, /it/it/p/ls-blukids-franchising.html, /it/it/p/ls-croff-chi-siamo.html and /it/it/p/ls-croff-franchising.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
13 pages without an H1
/it/it/loyalty-landing, /it/it/p/ls-upim-chi-siamo.html, /it/it/p/ls-upim-franchising.html, /it/it/p/ls-blukids-chi-siamo.html, /it/it/p/ls-blukids-franchising.html and /it/it/p/ls-croff-chi-siamo.html and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 194 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
14 small tap targets
14 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
2 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://upim.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.upim.com/s/Sites-upim-Site/dw/shared_session_redirect?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.blukids.com%2Fit%2Fit%2F.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (upim.com).
Valid certificate (146 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1 verifies for upim.com and is valid for another 146 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://upim.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 45 links work
All 45 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 5 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
upim.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
upim.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 24 years old
24 yearsupim.com was registered in Mar 2002 through NETIM SAS. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Mar 2027
upim.com is registered until Mar 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 777 words of copy
The homepage carries about 777 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be upim.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- OVHcloud
Company
- Founded
- 1928
- Headquarters
- Milan
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 53 issues on upim.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.