Website review, no card needed
uwp.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202631 issues · 79 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on uwp.edu, 16 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 93 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 91 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 91 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 115 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
8.8 s · 3.9 MB34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.9 MB).
Improve image delivery
3.2 s · 2.3 MB6 images could be 2.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.9 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 585 KiBAbout 585 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.3 s · 272 KiBAbout 272 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and discoveruwp.org and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 800 ms
800 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 800 ms of main-thread work and 863 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Document request latency
371 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
2,600 HTML elements
The page has 2,600 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 218 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
27 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 270 ms
270 msYour server sent the HTML in 270 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.0 s
23.0 sYour largest element takes 23.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “TURN AMBITION INTO ACHIEVEMENT Since 1968, UW–Parkside has …”.
Time to Interactive: 25.4 s
25.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.5 s
6.5 sThe first text or image appears after 6.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.5 s
6.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 25% slower for real visitors
+25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 115 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 138% slower for real visitors
+138%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 480 ms
480 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 480 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 110 ms
110 msReal visitors wait 110 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.5 MB in 68 requests
5.5 MBYour homepage downloads 5.5 MB in 68 requests on a phone: images 3.1 MB (13), scripts 1.4 MB (23) and HTML 554 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images in older formats
3 images (255 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (255 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.57 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.57 g of CO₂e: 188.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 0 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
296 internal links, 22 external
The homepage links to 296 pages on uwp.edu and 22 external pages.
7 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Turn Ambition into Achievement”.
Title: 32 characters
Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “University of Wisconsin–Parkside”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.uwp.edu/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollegeOrUniversity, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.uwp.edu/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,115 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.uwp.edu/llms.txt (9 KiB, 94 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
https://www.uwp.edu/logins, https://www.uwp.edu/explore/contactus, https://www.uwp.edu/events, https://www.uwp.edu/giving, https://www.uwp.edu/live and https://www.uwp.edu/do and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://www.uwp.edu/events has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.uwp.edu/live took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 123 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 small tap targets
2 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 595 words of copy
The homepage carries about 595 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
18 calls to action
The homepage has 18 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Apply Now” and “Course Schedule”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at uwp.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Wisc Madison
Company
- Employees
- 547
- Founded
- 1968
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on uwp.edu, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.