Website review, no card needed

vetoreditora.com.br logo

vetoreditora.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202640 issues · 88 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on vetoreditora.com.br, 15 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.3 sApr 25Oct 101.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20261.4 s
May 2, 20261.5 s
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
229 ms140 msApr 25Oct 10219 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026150 ms
May 2, 2026154 ms
May 9, 2026155 ms
May 16, 2026155 ms
May 23, 2026154 ms
May 30, 2026155 ms
Jun 6, 2026157 ms
Jun 13, 2026163 ms
Jun 20, 2026164 ms
Jun 27, 2026162 ms
Jul 4, 2026167 ms
Jul 11, 2026166 ms
Jul 18, 2026177 ms
Jul 25, 2026189 ms
Aug 1, 2026201 ms
Aug 8, 2026207 ms
Aug 15, 2026205 ms
Aug 22, 2026209 ms
Aug 29, 2026210 ms
Sep 5, 2026209 ms
Sep 12, 2026214 ms
Sep 19, 2026215 ms
Sep 26, 2026210 ms
Oct 3, 2026215 ms
Oct 10, 2026219 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vetoreditora.com.br (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vetoreditora.com.br at 4.1 s4.1 s
  2. vetoreditora.com.br at 8.3 s8.3 s
  3. vetoreditora.com.br at 12.4 s12.4 s
  4. vetoreditora.com.br at 16.6 s16.6 s
  5. vetoreditora.com.br at 20.7 s20.7 s
  6. vetoreditora.com.br at 24.8 s24.8 s
  7. vetoreditora.com.br at 29.0 s29.0 s
  8. vetoreditora.com.br at 33.1 s33.1 s

Speed

14 to fix7
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.8 s · 992 KiB

    About 992 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 10.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 10.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 7

    7/100

    Your mobile performance score is 7. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    950 ms · 6.1 MB

    61 images could be 6.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 950 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, fbitsstatic.net and Google CDN and others), adding 9.0 MB and 3.2 s of main-thread time.

  • fbitsstatic.net adds 818 ms

    818 ms

    fbitsstatic.net costs a phone 818 ms of main-thread work and 2.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 365 KiB

    26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (365 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 855 ms

    855 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 855 ms of main-thread work and 652 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • Google CDN adds 506 ms

    506 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 506 ms of main-thread work and 730 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ContentSquare adds 405 ms

    405 ms

    ContentSquare costs a phone 405 ms of main-thread work and 187 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 321 ms

    321 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 321 ms of main-thread work and 224 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,870 HTML elements

    The page has 2,870 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 266 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 57 KiB

    About 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    40 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 35 ms

    35 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 35 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.8 s

    8.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.9 s

    15.9 s

    Your largest element takes 15.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “banner”.

  • Speed Index: 46.2 s

    46.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 46.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 43.9 s

    43.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 43.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.891

    0.891

    The layout shifts by 0.891 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 233 ms

    233 ms

    Real visitors wait 233 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors

    +43%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 150 ms to 219 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 18 images without width and height

    18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.09

    0.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 716 ms

    716 ms

    Real visitors wait 716 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 9.8 MB in 287 requests

    9.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.8 MB in 287 requests on a phone: images 6.9 MB (104), scripts 2.3 MB (57) and other files 512 KiB (111). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    894253a8-809b-4ed9-bde9-b2a1e0996a39.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    9 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 257651-1.jpg at 600 px wide, shown at 181 px. Resized copies would save about 9 KiB.

  • About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.78 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.78 g of CO₂e: 333.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8794
  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 26 form fields without a label

    26 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 121 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10097
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 441 internal links, 49 external

    The homepage links to 441 pages on vetoreditora.com.br and 49 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 123 characters

    Your meta description is 123 characters: “Testes e avaliações psicológicas, instrumentos multidisciplinares e livros de qualidade. Conheça as soluções Vetor Edit…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “vetoreditora”.

  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Giunti Psychometrics | Vetor Editora - Avaliações Psicológicas”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,435 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/distribuidores and https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/busca have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 12 pages without an H1

    https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/aplicacao-de-teste-e-avaliacao-psicologica, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/avaliacao-psicossocial, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/cursos-e-treinamentos-personalizados-e-supervisao-de-teste, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/rh-e-projetos-organizacionais and https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/palestras-workshops-oficinas-ou-roda-de-conversa and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 8 pages slow to respond

    https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/rh-e-projetos-organizacionais, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/palestras-workshops-oficinas-ou-roda-de-conversa, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/projetos-escolares, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/produto/nr-01-pade-fp-preco-sob-consulta-72167, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/testes and https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/testes/colecao-de-testes and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 155 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 6988
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The source list for the Content Security Policy directive 'default-src' contains an invalid source: '.contentsquare.net…”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    111 of 111 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 534 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 534 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Suporte via acesso remoto | Download”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 7 phone links and 4 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vetoreditora.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on vetoreditora.com.br, including 24 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25