Website review, no card needed
vetoreditora.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202640 issues · 88 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on vetoreditora.com.br, 15 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 219 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
4.1 s
8.3 s
12.4 s
16.6 s
20.7 s
24.8 s
29.0 s
33.1 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.8 s · 992 KiBAbout 992 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.8 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 10.3 s
A phone's processor spends 10.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 7
7/100Your mobile performance score is 7. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
950 ms · 6.1 MB61 images could be 6.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 950 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, fbitsstatic.net and Google CDN and others), adding 9.0 MB and 3.2 s of main-thread time.
fbitsstatic.net adds 818 ms
818 msfbitsstatic.net costs a phone 818 ms of main-thread work and 2.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 365 KiB26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (365 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 855 ms
855 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 855 ms of main-thread work and 652 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
Google CDN adds 506 ms
506 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 506 ms of main-thread work and 730 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
ContentSquare adds 405 ms
405 msContentSquare costs a phone 405 ms of main-thread work and 187 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 321 ms
321 msFacebook costs a phone 321 ms of main-thread work and 224 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,870 HTML elements
The page has 2,870 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 266 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 57 KiBAbout 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
40 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 35 ms
35 msYour server sent the HTML in 35 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 8.8 s
8.8 sThe first text or image appears after 8.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.9 s
15.9 sYour largest element takes 15.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “banner”.
Speed Index: 46.2 s
46.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 46.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 43.9 s
43.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 43.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.891
0.891The layout shifts by 0.891 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 233 ms
233 msReal visitors wait 233 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors
+43%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 150 ms to 219 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
18 images without width and height
18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 716 ms
716 msReal visitors wait 716 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.8 MB in 287 requests
9.8 MBYour homepage downloads 9.8 MB in 287 requests on a phone: images 6.9 MB (104), scripts 2.3 MB (57) and other files 512 KiB (111). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
894253a8-809b-4ed9-bde9-b2a1e0996a39.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image far larger than shown
9 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 257651-1.jpg at 600 px wide, shown at 181 px. Resized copies would save about 9 KiB.
About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit
2.78 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.78 g of CO₂e: 333.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
13 text elements with low contrast
13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
26 form fields without a label
26 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 121 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
441 internal links, 49 external
The homepage links to 441 pages on vetoreditora.com.br and 49 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 123 characters
Your meta description is 123 characters: “Testes e avaliações psicológicas, instrumentos multidisciplinares e livros de qualidade. Conheça as soluções Vetor Edit…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “vetoreditora”.
Title: 62 characters
Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Giunti Psychometrics | Vetor Editora - Avaliações Psicológicas”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,435 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/distribuidores and https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/busca have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
12 pages without an H1
https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/aplicacao-de-teste-e-avaliacao-psicologica, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/avaliacao-psicossocial, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/cursos-e-treinamentos-personalizados-e-supervisao-de-teste, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/rh-e-projetos-organizacionais and https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/palestras-workshops-oficinas-ou-roda-de-conversa and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
8 pages slow to respond
https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/rh-e-projetos-organizacionais, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/palestras-workshops-oficinas-ou-roda-de-conversa, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/vetor-servicos/projetos-e-servicos/projetos-escolares, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/produto/nr-01-pade-fp-preco-sob-consulta-72167, https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/testes and https://www.vetoreditora.com.br/testes/colecao-de-testes and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 155 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The source list for the Content Security Policy directive 'default-src' contains an invalid source: '.contentsquare.net…”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
111 of 111 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 534 words of copy
The homepage carries about 534 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Suporte via acesso remoto | Download”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 7 phone links and 4 email links.
Privacy and tracking
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vetoreditora.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on vetoreditora.com.br, including 24 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.