Website review, no card needed
vinalium.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202645 issues · 84 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on vinalium.com, 20 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
60D- #86,404 of 88,857 reviewed websitesbeats 2%
- #45,799 of 46,257 online storesbeats 1%
- #2,113 of 2,159 WooCommerce storesbeats 1%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 215 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 213 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 209 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 207 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 208 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 307 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 318 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 322 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.6 s58 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.6 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.2 s · 655 KiBAbout 655 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 16
16/100Your mobile performance score is 16. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
50 ms · 1.6 MB25 images could be 1.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and netlify.app and others), adding 2.2 MB and 752 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 127 KiBAbout 127 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.6 s
A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 322 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
Google Tag Manager adds 254 ms
254 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 254 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
netlify.app adds 113 ms
113 msnetlify.app costs a phone 113 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,180 HTML elements
The page has 2,180 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
221 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (221 KiB).
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 52 KiB52 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
18 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 385 ms
385 msYour server sent the HTML in 385 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.4 s
23.4 sYour largest element takes 23.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “SOY MAYOR DE 18 AÑOS SOY MENOR DE 18 AÑOS”.
Time to Interactive: 26.0 s
26.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.001
1.001The layout shifts by 1.001 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 8.5 s
8.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 825 ms
825 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 825 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 307 ms
307 msReal visitors wait 307 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 50% slower for real visitors
+50%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 215 ms to 322 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors
-20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.7 MB in 205 requests
5.7 MBYour homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 205 requests on a phone: scripts 2.6 MB (74), images 2.6 MB (42) and stylesheets 268 KiB (60). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
16 images in older formats
16 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
texto-banner-inicio-600x253.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.62 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.62 g of CO₂e: 194.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
27 form fields without a label
27 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (27 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 27 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
53 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 62 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 9 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
143 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 143 pages on vinalium.com and 6 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 143 characters
Your meta description is 143 characters: “Compra vino online en Vinalium, tu tienda especializada con una selección de vinos exclusivos elegidos por enólogos. De…”.
Title: 50 characters
Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Comprar vinos online en Vinalium | Tienda de vinos”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://vinalium.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://vinalium.com/sitemaps.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (877 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (195 KiB, 564 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 81 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://chatbot-vinalium.netlify.app/vinalium-widget.css' from origin 'https://vinalium.co…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
98 of 118 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 543 words of copy
The homepage carries about 543 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
4 short forms
4 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
24 cookies set on arrival
24Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vinalium.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on vinalium.com, including 24 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.