Website review, no card needed
viccarbe.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202632 issues · 75 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on viccarbe.com, 15 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: avoid multiple page redirects. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79C- #49,409 of 108,915 reviewed websitesbeats 49%
- #32,648 of 61,773 online storesbeats 41%
- #690 of 2,514 WooCommerce storesbeats 68%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 117 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 117 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.3 s
1.7 s
2.1 s
2.5 s
2.9 s
3.4 s
Speed
Avoid multiple page redirects
17.4 sThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 17.4 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Reduce unused JavaScript
7.5 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 32
32/100Your mobile performance score is 32 (desktop: 43). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.0 s
A phone's processor spends 5.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Unpkg, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Hubspot and others), adding 6.0 MB and 20 ms of main-thread time.
Vimeo adds 0 ms
0 msVimeo costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 5.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 47 KiB47 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 269 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 0 ms
0 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 354 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 33 KiBAbout 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 11.0 s
11.0 sThe first text or image appears after 11.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 44.1 s
44.1 sYour largest element takes 44.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Speed Index: 16.7 s
16.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 16.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 45.9 s
45.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 45.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
25 images without width and height
25 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 117 ms to 117 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 770 ms
770 msReal visitors wait 770 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 36% faster for real visitors
-36%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 37.7 MB in 205 requests
37.7 MBYour homepage downloads 37.7 MB in 205 requests on a phone: media 25.4 MB (6), images 8.2 MB (80) and scripts 2.9 MB (57). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
564 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Tapizados-perxa.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 564 KiB.
2 images in older formats
2 images (897 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 10.7 g of CO₂ per visit
10.68 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.68 g of CO₂e: 1282.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
14 text elements with low contrast
14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
20 images without alt text
20 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (190 characters)
Your meta description is 190 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
101 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 101 pages on viccarbe.com and 14 external pages.
7 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Timeless design with 10 years warranty We manufacture collaborative furniture designed with renowned designers and we o…”.
Title: 50 characters
Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Timeless furniture design for collaborative spaces”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.viccarbe.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.viccarbe.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.viccarbe.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,016 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 50 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Best practices
23 small tap targets
23 of 47 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 718 words of copy
The homepage carries about 718 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Get in touch” and “Start now”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 12 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Hotjar and HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
22 cookies set on arrival
22Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
25 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at viccarbe.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on viccarbe.com, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.