Programmable

Website review, no card needed

viva.com.ph logo

viva.com.ph website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202619 issues · 69 checks

This review found 19 issues worth fixing on viva.com.ph, 5 of them high impact, across 69 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

73C

Closest competitors among reviewed websites

Compare side by side
Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.8 s4.8 sMay 16Oct 315.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.9 s
May 23, 20265.0 s
May 30, 20265.1 s
Jun 6, 20265.1 s
Jun 13, 20265.2 s
Jun 20, 20265.2 s
Jun 27, 20265.2 s
Jul 4, 20265.3 s
Jul 18, 20265.2 s
Jul 25, 20265.3 s
Aug 1, 20265.4 s
Aug 8, 20265.4 s
Aug 15, 20265.4 s
Aug 22, 20265.4 s
Aug 29, 20265.4 s
Sep 5, 20265.4 s
Sep 12, 20265.5 s
Sep 19, 20265.5 s
Sep 26, 20265.6 s
Oct 3, 20265.6 s
Oct 10, 20265.6 s
Oct 17, 20265.6 s
Oct 24, 20265.7 s
Oct 31, 20265.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
152 ms124 msMay 16Oct 31149 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026132 ms
May 23, 2026135 ms
May 30, 2026134 ms
Jun 6, 2026127 ms
Jun 13, 2026127 ms
Jun 20, 2026129 ms
Jun 27, 2026128 ms
Jul 4, 2026134 ms
Jul 18, 2026128 ms
Jul 25, 2026127 ms
Aug 1, 2026134 ms
Aug 8, 2026135 ms
Aug 15, 2026137 ms
Aug 22, 2026141 ms
Aug 29, 2026139 ms
Sep 5, 2026138 ms
Sep 12, 2026139 ms
Sep 19, 2026136 ms
Sep 26, 2026137 ms
Oct 3, 2026139 ms
Oct 10, 2026139 ms
Oct 17, 2026143 ms
Oct 24, 2026146 ms
Oct 31, 2026149 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

viva.com.ph (opens in a new tab)
Full-page screenshot of viva.com.ph (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. viva.com.ph at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. viva.com.ph at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. viva.com.ph at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. viva.com.ph at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. viva.com.ph at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. viva.com.ph at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. viva.com.ph at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. viva.com.ph at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

94

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 45 KiB

    About 45 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    6 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6 KiB).

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Amazon Web Services), adding 6 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

3 checks passed

  • Mobile performance score: 94

    94/100

    Your mobile performance score is 94. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 165 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix0

  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Real visitors wait 5.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.23

    0.23

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.23 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Your largest element takes 2.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “logo”. Most of its time is resource load duration (1.3 s).

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 132 ms to 149 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.9 s to 5.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed

  • Speed Index: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.1 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.6 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Time to Interactive: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The page is fully interactive after 2.9 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100

  • About 0.09 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.09 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.09 g of CO₂e: 10.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed

  • Page weight: 321 KiB in 19 requests

    321 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 321 KiB in 19 requests on a phone: scripts 235 KiB (11), fonts 57 KiB (3) and stylesheets 16 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9595

  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed

  • Every image has alt text

    All 1 image in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 36 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 2 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10085

  • Title is short (4 characters)

    Your title is only 4 characters: “Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at http://localhost:3000/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 61 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 61 pages on viva.com.ph and 0 external pages.

5 checks passed

  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “Viva Communications, Inc., formerly known as Viva Entertainment is a premiere multi-media company known for its classic…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Viva Communication Inc.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://viva.com.ph/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://viva.com.ph/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed

  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix98

  • 10 pages share a meta description

    https://viva.com.ph/entertainment/epik, https://viva.com.ph/media/radios, https://viva.com.ph/music/records, https://viva.com.ph/music/artists, https://viva.com.ph/music/records/library and https://viva.com.ph/music/news and 4 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 10 pages with very little text

    https://viva.com.ph/vivamax, https://viva.com.ph/entertainment/films/coming-soon, https://viva.com.ph/media/paytvs/domestic, https://viva.com.ph/media/radios, https://viva.com.ph/music/records and https://viva.com.ph/music/artists and 4 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 7 pages slow to respond

    https://viva.com.ph/entertainment/films/coming-soon, https://viva.com.ph/entertainment/epik, https://viva.com.ph/media/paytvs/domestic, https://viva.com.ph/music/artists, https://viva.com.ph/music/records/library and https://viva.com.ph/music/news and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed

  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093

  • 22 small tap targets

    22 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed

  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix42

  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 52 words

    The homepage has only about 52 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at viva.com.ph, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
HASPcms
Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Vercel

Company

Founded
1981
Headquarters
Quezon City

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 19 issues on viva.com.ph, including 5 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25