Website review, no card needed

vivacy.com logo

vivacy.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202629 issues · 78 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on vivacy.com, 7 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
132 ms95 msMay 9Oct 24114 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026115 ms
May 16, 2026112 ms
May 23, 2026114 ms
May 30, 2026112 ms
Jun 6, 2026106 ms
Jun 13, 2026106 ms
Jun 20, 2026103 ms
Jun 27, 202699 ms
Jul 4, 2026106 ms
Jul 11, 2026101 ms
Jul 18, 2026109 ms
Jul 25, 2026117 ms
Aug 1, 2026120 ms
Aug 8, 2026128 ms
Aug 15, 2026128 ms
Aug 22, 2026122 ms
Aug 29, 2026122 ms
Sep 5, 2026112 ms
Sep 12, 2026108 ms
Sep 19, 2026108 ms
Sep 26, 2026106 ms
Oct 3, 2026104 ms
Oct 10, 202699 ms
Oct 17, 2026107 ms
Oct 24, 2026114 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vivacy.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vivacy.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. vivacy.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. vivacy.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. vivacy.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. vivacy.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. vivacy.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. vivacy.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. vivacy.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix70
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.8 s · 426 KiB

    About 426 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 70

    70/100

    Your mobile performance score is 70. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    500 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.

  • Google CDN adds 411 ms

    411 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 411 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 54 KiB

    About 54 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    327 KiB

    4 images could be 327 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Google Fonts), adding 799 KiB and 453 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 143 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 36 ms

    36 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 36 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.8 s

    11.8 s

    Your largest element takes 11.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “For over 16 years, VIVACY has been advancing the field of i…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.3 s

    12.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 854 ms

    854 ms

    Real visitors wait 854 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 114 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 135 ms

    135 ms

    Real visitors wait 135 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 168 ms

    168 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 168 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.4 MB in 35 requests

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 35 requests on a phone: scripts 1.0 MB (20), images 422 KiB (6) and fonts 356 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    137 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example image at 1,792 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 137 KiB.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.67 g of CO₂e: 80.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9396
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (14 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 39 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 3 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9287
  • Title is long (66 characters)

    Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Vivacy | Premium Injectable Hyaluronic Acid | Stylage® & Desirial®”.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 22 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 22 pages on vivacy.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “Vivacy, specialising in injectable hyaluronic acid. Discover the Stylage®, Hydromax & Desirial® ranges, filling treatme…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Vivacy”.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList and Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://vivacy.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://vivacy.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (846 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 2 pages without a title

    https://vivacy.com/en/legal-notice and https://vivacy.com/en/confidentiality have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 linked pages hidden from search

    https://vivacy.com/en/legal-notice and https://vivacy.com/en/confidentiality are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://vivacy.com/en/legal-notice and https://vivacy.com/en/confidentiality have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://vivacy.com/en/legal-notice has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 13 internal pages checked

    We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 10 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 880 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 880 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn more” and “Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (6 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vivacy.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Vercel

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on vivacy.com, including 13 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25