Website review, no card needed
vlex.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202625 issues · 96 checks
This review found 25 issues worth fixing on vlex.com, 5 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
85BClosest competitors among SaaS websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 468 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 461 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 456 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 443 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 429 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 435 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 451 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 459 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 454 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 445 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 445 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 449 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 449 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 439 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 431 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 425 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 419 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 428 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 426 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 432 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 440 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 449 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 470 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 473 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 480 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.0 s · 1.9 MB57 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.9 MB).
Mobile performance score: 73
73/100Your mobile performance score is 73 (desktop: 87). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 741 KiB14 images could be 741 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
500 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Unpkg and strapiapp.com and others), adding 1.7 MB and 250 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
382 KiBAbout 382 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
strapiapp.com adds 0 ms
0 msstrapiapp.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 172 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
107 KiBAbout 107 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.7 s
A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 251 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.4 s
6.4 sYour largest element takes 6.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Vincent delivers intelligence that understands the law. Tra…”.
Real-user INP: 203 ms
203 msReal visitors wait 203 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 981 ms
981 msReal visitors wait 981 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
47 images without width and height
47 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Time to Interactive: 6.5 s
6.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 6.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 468 ms to 480 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 190 ms
190 msScripts block the page for only 190 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.084
0.084The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.084, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Speed Index: 1.5 s
1.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 1.5 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
Linked_In_Vincent_by_Clio_Building_Vincent_Studio_A_Behind_t weighs 526 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
916 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Linked_In_Vincent_by_Clio_Building_Vincent_Studio_A_Behind_t at 3,240 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 916 KiB.
Page weight: 2.5 MB in 71 requests
2.5 MBYour homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 71 requests on a phone: images 2.1 MB (48), scripts 264 KiB (6) and fonts 97 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images in older formats
10 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
11 images below the first screen load straight away
11 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit
0.70 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.70 g of CO₂e: 84.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 56 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://vlex.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
7 links with vague text
7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
63 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 63 pages on vlex.com and 6 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 160 characters
Your meta description is 160 characters: “vLex (part of Clio) is the leading AI legal research platform. Trusted by 2.8M+ lawyers for AI-powered legal research, …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “AI Engineered for Lawyers”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “vLex (Part of Clio) | AI Legal Research Tools for Lawyers”.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 2 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot and Google-Extended, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (971 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://login.vlex.com/ (404).
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (vlex.com).
Valid certificate (177 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for vlex.com and is valid for another 177 days.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://vlex.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
vlex.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
vlex.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 26 years old
26 yearsvlex.com was registered in Dec 1999 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Dec 2032
vlex.com is registered until Dec 2032.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 911 words of copy
The homepage carries about 911 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book a Demo” and “Start a Free Trial”.
14 calls to action
The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Try Vincent”, “Book a Demo” and “Start a Free Trial”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 29 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a:vlex.com ip4:34.200.40.128 ip4:54.164.189.136 ip4:100.25.207.252 include:aspmx.googlemail.com include:spf.man…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “k1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 25 issues on vlex.com, including 13 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.