Website review, no card needed
waterdropfilter.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202638 issues · 95 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on waterdropfilter.com, 12 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: amazon Web Services adds 1.4 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82B- #29,613 of 104,340 reviewed websitesbeats 66%
- #19,515 of 58,388 online storesbeats 60%
- #18,863 of 53,173 Shopify storesbeats 58%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 228 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 212 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 141 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.7 s
3.4 s
5.0 s
6.7 s
8.4 s
10.1 s
11.8 s
13.5 s
Speed
Amazon Web Services adds 1.4 s
1.4 sAmazon Web Services costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 30 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 13.8 s
A phone's processor spends 13.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 40
40/100Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
6,079 HTML elements
The page has 6,079 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Amazon Web Services, consentmanager.net and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.7 MB and 4.1 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 1,013 KiB54 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1,013 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 658 ms
658 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 658 ms of main-thread work and 539 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
consentmanager.net adds 692 ms
692 msconsentmanager.net costs a phone 692 ms of main-thread work and 158 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 529 ms
529 msShopify costs a phone 529 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
500 ms10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 370 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
269 KiB10 images could be 269 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Sentry adds 253 ms
253 msSentry costs a phone 253 ms of main-thread work and 48 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
57 KiBAbout 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
49 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 49 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 14 ms
14 msYour server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 33.4 s
33.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.6 s
7.6 sYour largest element takes 7.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 12.0 s
12.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s
1.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
10 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 145 ms
145 msReal visitors wait 145 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 712 ms
712 msReal visitors wait 712 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 36% faster for real visitors
-36%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 228 ms to 141 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 36% faster for real visitors
-36%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007
0.007The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.6 MB in 638 requests
6.6 MBYour homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 638 requests on a phone: scripts 3.7 MB (275), other files 1.1 MB (252) and images 946 KiB (53). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
2 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example wd-product-a2g-design-img-1.webp at 359 px wide, shown at 118 px. Resized copies would save about 2 KiB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (211 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.87 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.87 g of CO₂e: 224.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
14 text elements with low contrast
14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (13 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (13 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
53 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 6 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (66 characters)
Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Reverse Osmosis Water Filters & Water Purifier Systems | Waterdrop”.
30 links with vague text
30 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
521 internal links, 34 external
The homepage links to 521 pages on waterdropfilter.com and 34 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Shop NSF certified reverse osmosis systems, undersink RO systems & countertop reverse osmosis water filters. Enjoy free…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Reverse Osmosis Water Filters for Clean, Safe Drinking Water”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.waterdropfilter.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.waterdropfilter.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (5,027 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.waterdropfilter.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages share a meta description
https://www.waterdropfilter.com/collections/undersink-ro-systems, https://www.waterdropfilter.com/collections/undersink-ro-systems/waterdrop-x-series, https://www.waterdropfilter.com/collections/undersink-ro-systems/waterdrop-g-series and https://www.waterdropfilter.com/collections/undersink-ro-systems/waterdrop-k-series use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
6 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 6 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.waterdropfilter.com/collections/undersink-ro-systems/waterdrop-x-series, whose canonical is https://www.waterdropfilter.com/collections/undersink-ro-systems. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
6 pages slow to respond
https://www.waterdropfilter.com/collections/reverse-osmosis-water-filter-all, https://www.waterdropfilter.com/collections/waterdrop-undersink-water-filtration-system, https://www.waterdropfilter.com/collections/countertop-water-filters, https://www.waterdropfilter.com/collections/whole-house-water-filters, https://www.waterdropfilter.com/pages/reverse-osmosis-water-system-xseries and https://www.waterdropfilter.com/products/ro-system-for-home-alkaline-x8-a took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 193 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
24 small tap targets
24 of 120 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot assign to read only property 'open' of object '#<Window>'”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
About 2,012 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,012 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Now”.
122 calls to action
The homepage has 122 calls to action, for example “Shop Now”, “Shop All” and “Shop By”.
11 short forms
11 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 6 customer or partner logos, a star rating, 7 trust badges and “7+ Members”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (consentmanager) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
30 cookies set on arrival
30Opening the homepage sets 30 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
55 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 55 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: consentmanager
A consent management tool (consentmanager) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at waterdropfilter.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 18 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Blockify Fraud Filter · Elevate Ab Testing · Social Login · Region Restrictions · Localizing · Facebook Pixel · Ecomsend · Vanchat · goaffpro.com · trafficmanager.net · amazonaws.com · verifypass.com · trustpilot.com · qrcodegeneratorhub.com · rakutenadvertising.io · quickcep.com · emarsys.net · cloudfront.net
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on waterdropfilter.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.