Website review, no card needed
wayup.pt website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202644 issues · 85 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on wayup.pt, 24 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
61D- #95,933 of 99,128 reviewed websitesbeats 3%
- #53,582 of 54,264 online storesbeats 1%
- #235 of 268 Salesforce Commerce Cloud storesbeats 11%
Closest competitors among Salesforce Commerce Cloud stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 411 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 415 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 420 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 432 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 443 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 451 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 462 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 463 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 458 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 461 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 453 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 444 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 444 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 438 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 439 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 443 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 449 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 453 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 452 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 446 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 443 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 442 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 443 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 442 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 429 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.8 s
2.7 s
3.6 s
4.4 s
5.3 s
6.2 s
7.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
6.7 s · 4.4 MB56 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.4 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.5 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
1.0 s · 625 KiB2 images could be 625 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s
1.2 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 724 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
11,356 HTML elements
The page has 11,356 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 10
10/100Your mobile performance score is 10. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.4 s
A phone's processor spends 5.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and mc.pt and others), adding 4.8 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
Cookiebot adds 906 ms
906 msCookiebot costs a phone 906 ms of main-thread work and 187 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 158 KiBAbout 158 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 364 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
mc.pt adds 105 ms
105 msmc.pt costs a phone 105 ms of main-thread work and 2.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Azure Web Services adds 1 ms
1 msAzure Web Services costs a phone 1 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
250 ms · 40 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 304 ms
304 msYour server sent the HTML in 304 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.33
0.33For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.33 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.6 s
12.6 sYour largest element takes 12.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Wayup”.
Time to Interactive: 34.1 s
34.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 34.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.1 s
10.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s
1.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.583
0.583The layout shifts by 0.583 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sThe first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 363 ms
363 msReal visitors wait 363 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 411 ms to 429 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 734 ms
734 msReal visitors wait 734 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.4 MB in 82 requests
6.4 MBYour homepage downloads 6.4 MB in 82 requests on a phone: scripts 4.2 MB (33), images 1.5 MB (20) and fonts 266 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images in older formats
3 images (783 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.80 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.80 g of CO₂e: 216.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
35 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Links must have discernible text (37 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 37 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
35 form fields without a label
35 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (164 characters)
Your meta description is 164 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
1,497 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 1,497 pages on wayup.pt and 5 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Way Up”.
Title: 48 characters
Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Way Up | Nutrição Desportiva | Continente Online”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.continente.pt/marcas/way-up/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.continente.pt/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.continente.pt/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,549 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.continente.pt/recomendacoes is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
9 pages without a meta description
https://www.continente.pt/supermercado, https://www.continente.pt/supermercado/frutas-e-legumes, https://www.continente.pt/supermercado/frutas-e-legumes/frutas, https://www.continente.pt/supermercado/frutas-e-legumes/frutas/banana, https://www.continente.pt/supermercado/frutas-e-legumes/frutas/maca and https://www.continente.pt/supermercado/frutas-e-legumes/frutas/pera and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
12 pages without an H1
https://www.continente.pt/loja-online/ajuda, /, https://www.continente.pt/recomendacoes, https://www.continente.pt/supermercado, https://www.continente.pt/supermercado/frutas-e-legumes and https://www.continente.pt/supermercado/frutas-e-legumes/frutas and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
10 pages slow to respond
https://www.continente.pt/loja-online/ajuda, /, https://www.continente.pt/recomendacoes, https://www.continente.pt/supermercado, https://www.continente.pt/supermercado/frutas-e-legumes/frutas and https://www.continente.pt/supermercado/frutas-e-legumes/frutas/maca and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'findIndex')”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
47 of 51 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 972 words of copy
The homepage carries about 972 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wayup.pt, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify;Shopify Plus
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Hiring
- Hiring
- 2 open roles
- Job board
- smartrecruiters
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on wayup.pt, including 23 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.