Website review, no card needed

waze.com logo

waze.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202642 issues · 74 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on waze.com, 19 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.6 s4.0 sApr 18Oct 34.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20265.3 s
Apr 25, 20265.2 s
May 2, 20265.2 s
May 9, 20265.2 s
May 16, 20265.2 s
May 23, 20265.2 s
May 30, 20265.2 s
Jun 6, 20265.2 s
Jun 13, 20265.3 s
Jun 20, 20265.4 s
Jun 27, 20265.4 s
Jul 4, 20265.2 s
Jul 11, 20264.9 s
Jul 18, 20264.6 s
Jul 25, 20264.5 s
Aug 1, 20264.5 s
Aug 8, 20264.5 s
Aug 15, 20264.5 s
Aug 22, 20264.6 s
Aug 29, 20264.6 s
Sep 5, 20264.7 s
Sep 12, 20264.6 s
Sep 19, 20264.5 s
Sep 26, 20264.3 s
Oct 3, 20264.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
279 ms166 msApr 18Oct 3266 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026187 ms
Apr 25, 2026186 ms
May 2, 2026184 ms
May 9, 2026181 ms
May 16, 2026179 ms
May 23, 2026179 ms
May 30, 2026179 ms
Jun 6, 2026180 ms
Jun 13, 2026180 ms
Jun 20, 2026181 ms
Jun 27, 2026183 ms
Jul 4, 2026187 ms
Jul 11, 2026188 ms
Jul 18, 2026189 ms
Jul 25, 2026190 ms
Aug 1, 2026188 ms
Aug 8, 2026188 ms
Aug 15, 2026187 ms
Aug 22, 2026187 ms
Aug 29, 2026187 ms
Sep 5, 2026188 ms
Sep 12, 2026197 ms
Sep 19, 2026217 ms
Sep 26, 2026240 ms
Oct 3, 2026266 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of waze.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. waze.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. waze.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. waze.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. waze.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. waze.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. waze.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. waze.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. waze.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix46
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    18.2 s · 3.3 MB

    33 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.3 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    16.7 s · 3.0 MB

    12 images could be 3.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 16.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.6 s · 962 KiB

    About 962 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 40). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Google Analytics and others), adding 902 KiB and 790 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 523 ms

    523 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 523 ms of main-thread work and 491 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 413 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google CDN adds 240 ms

    240 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 240 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 19 KiB

    About 19 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 28.8 s

    28.8 s

    Your largest element takes 28.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.8 s

    28.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 897 ms

    897 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 897 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 266 ms

    266 ms

    Real visitors wait 266 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 36% slower for real visitors

    +36%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 187 ms to 266 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 671 ms

    671 ms

    Real visitors wait 671 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors

    -19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.3 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 6.3 MB in 74 requests

    6.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.3 MB in 74 requests on a phone: images 3.4 MB (27), scripts 2.1 MB (13) and other files 382 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (2.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.78 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.78 g of CO₂e: 213.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7282
  • Images must have alternative text (15 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (2 elements)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 25 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 32 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 25 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9283
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 128 characters

    Your meta description is 128 characters: “Realtime driving directions based on live traffic updates from Waze - Get the best route to your destination from fello…”.

  • Title: 65 characters

    Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Driving directions, live traffic & road conditions updates - Waze”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.waze.com/live-map.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.waze.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.waze.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Refused to apply style from 'https://www.waze.com/livemap/assets/vendor.css' because its MIME type ('application/json')…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 6 words

    The homepage has only about 6 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at waze.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on waze.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25