Website review, no card needed
waze.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202642 issues · 74 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on waze.com, 19 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 186 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 184 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 181 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 266 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
18.2 s · 3.3 MB33 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.3 MB).
Improve image delivery
16.7 s · 3.0 MB12 images could be 3.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 16.7 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.6 s · 962 KiBAbout 962 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 40). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Google Analytics and others), adding 902 KiB and 790 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 523 ms
523 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 523 ms of main-thread work and 491 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 413 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google CDN adds 240 ms
240 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 240 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.7 s
A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 19 KiBAbout 19 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
8 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 28.8 s
28.8 sYour largest element takes 28.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 28.8 s
28.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 897 ms
897 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 897 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 6.4 s
6.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 266 ms
266 msReal visitors wait 266 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 36% slower for real visitors
+36%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 187 ms to 266 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
5 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 671 ms
671 msReal visitors wait 671 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors
-19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.3 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.3 MB in 74 requests
6.3 MBYour homepage downloads 6.3 MB in 74 requests on a phone: images 3.4 MB (27), scripts 2.1 MB (13) and other files 382 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
15 images in older formats
15 images (2.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.78 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.78 g of CO₂e: 213.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (15 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
4 buttons without a name
4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
25 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 32 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 25 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 128 characters
Your meta description is 128 characters: “Realtime driving directions based on live traffic updates from Waze - Get the best route to your destination from fello…”.
Title: 65 characters
Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Driving directions, live traffic & road conditions updates - Waze”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.waze.com/live-map.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.waze.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.waze.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Refused to apply style from 'https://www.waze.com/livemap/assets/vendor.css' because its MIME type ('application/json')…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 6 words
The homepage has only about 6 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at waze.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on waze.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.