Website review, no card needed

wcf.co.uk logo

wcf.co.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202623 issues · 81 checks

This review found 23 issues worth fixing on wcf.co.uk, 4 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.0 s636 msMay 2Oct 17959 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 2026690 ms
May 9, 2026820 ms
May 16, 2026687 ms
May 23, 2026784 ms
May 30, 2026681 ms
Jun 6, 2026709 ms
Jun 13, 2026858 ms
Jun 20, 2026758 ms
Jun 27, 2026832 ms
Jul 4, 2026844 ms
Jul 11, 2026801 ms
Jul 18, 2026877 ms
Jul 25, 2026877 ms
Aug 1, 2026910 ms
Aug 8, 2026960 ms
Aug 15, 2026939 ms
Aug 22, 2026832 ms
Aug 29, 2026892 ms
Sep 5, 2026870 ms
Sep 12, 2026820 ms
Sep 19, 2026895 ms
Sep 26, 2026880 ms
Oct 3, 2026914 ms
Oct 10, 2026979 ms
Oct 17, 2026959 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
101 ms66 msMay 2Oct 1787 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202670 ms
May 9, 202671 ms
May 16, 202671 ms
May 23, 202675 ms
Jun 13, 202689 ms
Jun 20, 202676 ms
Jun 27, 202674 ms
Jul 4, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202681 ms
Aug 1, 202681 ms
Aug 8, 202694 ms
Aug 15, 202697 ms
Aug 22, 202696 ms
Aug 29, 202697 ms
Sep 5, 202695 ms
Sep 12, 202695 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202687 ms
Oct 3, 202692 ms
Oct 10, 202687 ms
Oct 17, 202687 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wcf.co.uk (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wcf.co.uk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. wcf.co.uk at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. wcf.co.uk at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. wcf.co.uk at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. wcf.co.uk at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. wcf.co.uk at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. wcf.co.uk at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. wcf.co.uk at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix78
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 78

    78/100

    Your mobile performance score is 78 (desktop: 99). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 298 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (298 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    357 KiB

    6 images could be 357 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Cloudflare CDN adds 20 ms

    20 ms

    Cloudflare CDN costs a phone 20 ms of main-thread work and 323 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot, Cloudflare CDN and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 822 KiB and 154 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 51 KiB

    About 51 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 68 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    27 KiB

    About 27 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 205 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Your largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Today, more than 350 employee-owners work across the WCF bu…”.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 70 ms to 87 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 28% slower for real visitors

    +28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.7 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Time to Interactive: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 5.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 89 ms

    89 ms

    Real visitors wait 89 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 355 ms

    355 ms

    Real visitors wait 355 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.03

    0.03

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.03, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 9 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix90
  • 1 image far larger than shown

    311 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example logo.png at 2,210 px wide, shown at 106 px. Resized copies would save about 311 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (318 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.34 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.34 g of CO₂e: 40.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.2 MB in 32 requests

    1.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.2 MB in 32 requests on a phone: scripts 563 KiB (15), images 381 KiB (6) and fonts 228 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9597
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 7 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10089
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 15 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 15 pages on wcf.co.uk and 2 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 141 characters

    Your meta description is 141 characters: “WCF is an employee owned, private company operating a number of autonomous businesses focused on niche retailing and sp…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Welcome to WCF”.

  • Title: 48 characters

    Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Who Are We | What Do We Do | Find Out More | WCF”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wcf.co.uk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.wcf.co.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (417 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 4 pages with very little text

    https://www.wcf.co.uk/our-shareholders, https://www.wcf.co.uk/recruitment, https://www.wcf.co.uk/company-policies and https://www.wcf.co.uk/policy-statements have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 12 internal pages checked

    We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 445 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 445 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Join Our Family”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Matomo.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wcf.co.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Matomo

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 23 issues on wcf.co.uk, including 11 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25