Website review, no card needed

wch.org logo

wch.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202633 issues · 78 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on wch.org, 9 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.6 sMay 2Oct 172.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.1 s
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.2 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
91 ms76 msMay 2Oct 1788 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202679 ms
May 9, 202678 ms
May 16, 202680 ms
May 23, 202682 ms
May 30, 202683 ms
Jun 27, 202689 ms
Jul 11, 202687 ms
Jul 18, 202687 ms
Jul 25, 202685 ms
Aug 1, 202685 ms
Aug 8, 202683 ms
Aug 15, 202683 ms
Aug 22, 202687 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202688 ms
Sep 12, 202688 ms
Sep 19, 202683 ms
Sep 26, 202687 ms
Oct 3, 202686 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202688 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wch.org (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wch.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. wch.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. wch.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. wch.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. wch.org at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. wch.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. wch.org at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. wch.org at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix54
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.1 s · 577 KiB

    About 577 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    988 KiB

    7 images could be 988 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and cloudfront.net and others), adding 1.1 MB and 290 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 163 ms

    163 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 163 ms of main-thread work and 301 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 79 ms

    79 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 79 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 125 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 249 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    Your largest element takes 10.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Breaking the cycle of abuse and neglect by cultivating a co…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.6 s

    10.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.24

    0.24

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.218

    0.218

    The layout shifts by 0.218 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 88 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 87 ms

    87 ms

    Real visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 96 ms

    96 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 96 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix38
  • Page weight: 5.7 MB in 45 requests

    5.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 45 requests on a phone: images 4.6 MB (25), scripts 915 KiB (8) and fonts 129 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.61 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.61 g of CO₂e: 193.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9797
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 18 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 34 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 36 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9286
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://wch.org/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 116 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 116 pages on wch.org and 11 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 145 characters

    Your meta description is 145 characters: “Wichita Children’s Home breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect by cultivating a community where every child is safe and …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Who We Serve”.

  • Title: 37 characters

    Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “Wichita Children’s Home | Wichita, KS”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://wch.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (752 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 11 pages slow to respond

    https://wch.org/news, https://wch.org/who-we-serve/grief, https://wch.org/who-we-serve/abuse-neglect, https://wch.org/who-we-serve/abuse-neglect/emergency-shelter, https://wch.org/who-we-serve/abuse-neglect/polaris and https://wch.org/who-we-serve/abuse-neglect/foster-care-families and 5 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 41 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 397 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 397 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Apply for Housing” and “Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wch.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Headquarters
Wichita

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on wch.org, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25