Website review, no card needed

wearebond.com logo

wearebond.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202641 issues · 82 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on wearebond.com, 17 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.6 s3.4 sMay 9Oct 244.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.7 s
May 16, 20264.2 s
May 23, 20264.7 s
May 30, 20264.7 s
Jun 6, 20265.1 s
Jun 13, 20265.0 s
Jun 20, 20264.5 s
Jun 27, 20264.8 s
Jul 4, 20265.0 s
Jul 18, 20265.3 s
Aug 8, 20264.6 s
Aug 29, 20264.2 s
Sep 19, 20264.5 s
Sep 26, 20264.4 s
Oct 3, 20264.2 s
Oct 10, 20264.1 s
Oct 17, 20264.1 s
Oct 24, 20264.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
144 ms65 msMay 16Oct 2496 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202695 ms
May 23, 202698 ms
May 30, 202683 ms
Jun 6, 202674 ms
Jun 13, 202698 ms
Oct 3, 2026110 ms
Oct 10, 2026109 ms
Oct 17, 2026135 ms
Oct 24, 202696 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wearebond.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wearebond.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. wearebond.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. wearebond.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. wearebond.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. wearebond.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  6. wearebond.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  7. wearebond.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  8. wearebond.com at 4.3 s4.3 s

Speed

5 to fix62
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.8 s · 7.7 MB

    52 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.7 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    3.9 s · 2.7 MB

    25 images could be 2.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 192 KiB

    About 192 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 1,583 HTML elements

    The page has 1,583 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 199 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts and Google Analytics), adding 242 KiB and 60 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 656 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Real visitors wait 4.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    Your largest element takes 12.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors

    +20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 80 images without width and height

    80 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 4.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 84 ms

    84 ms

    Real visitors wait 84 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 151 ms

    151 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 151 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 19.6 MB in 68 requests

    19.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 19.6 MB in 68 requests on a phone: media 15.1 MB (9), images 3.7 MB (35) and scripts 419 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 3.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 30 images far larger than shown

    2.5 MB

    30 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Rafa-TSR-Tile.png at 1,200 px wide, shown at 394 px. Resized copies would save about 2.5 MB.

  • 37 images in older formats

    37 images (6.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 26 images below the first screen load straight away

    26 images further down the page (4.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.56 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.56 g of CO₂e: 667.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fix77
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    65 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

1 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 3 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8273
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.wearebond.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at wearebond.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 150 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 150 pages on wearebond.com and 4 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 70 characters

    Your meta description is 70 characters: “Award-winning full-service Entertainment Marketing Agency in Hollywood”.

  • Title: 37 characters

    Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “BOND - Entertainment Marketing Agency”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

1 to fix81
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.wearebond.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (226 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.wearebond.com/work all use the title “BOND - Entertainment Marketing Agency”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 14 pages share a meta description

    https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/hbo-max-branding, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/spiderman-brand-new-day, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/theodyssey, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/dunepartthree, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/spidernoir and https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/residentevil and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.wearebond.com/work, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/hbo-max-branding, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/spiderman-brand-new-day, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/theodyssey, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/dunepartthree and https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/spidernoir and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 14 pages with very little text

    https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/hbo-max-branding, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/spiderman-brand-new-day, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/theodyssey, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/dunepartthree, https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/spidernoir and https://www.wearebond.com/case-studies/residentevil and 8 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.wearebond.com/.

  • 43 small tap targets

    43 of 75 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Only about 202 words

    The homepage has only about 202 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Learn More” and “Contact”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wearebond.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Nuxt
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
AWS

Company

Founded
2013
Headquarters
New York City

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on wearebond.com, including 15 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25