Website review, no card needed

webassign.net logo

webassign.net website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202641 issues · 87 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on webassign.net, 17 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s4.0 sJul 18Sep 54.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jul 18, 20264.2 s
Jul 25, 20264.2 s
Aug 1, 20264.2 s
Aug 8, 20264.1 s
Aug 15, 20264.0 s
Aug 22, 20264.1 s
Aug 29, 20264.2 s
Sep 5, 20264.3 s

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of webassign.net (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. webassign.net at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. webassign.net at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. webassign.net at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. webassign.net at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. webassign.net at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. webassign.net at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. webassign.net at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. webassign.net at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix26
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.2 s · 1.6 MB

    73 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.6 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.4 s · 884 KiB

    About 884 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 26

    26/100

    Your mobile performance score is 26 (desktop: 52). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Amplitude Mobile Analytics and others), adding 2.0 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    750 ms · 365 KiB

    4 images could be 365 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 797 ms

    797 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 797 ms of main-thread work and 748 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Facebook adds 268 ms

    268 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 268 ms of main-thread work and 248 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Amplitude Mobile Analytics adds 123 ms

    123 ms

    Amplitude Mobile Analytics costs a phone 123 ms of main-thread work and 593 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 103 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 103 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 226 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    31 KiB

    About 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 52 but mobile only 26. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.1 s

    16.1 s

    Your largest element takes 16.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Two students”.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.9 s

    22.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 734 ms

    734 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 734 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.265

    0.265

    The layout shifts by 0.265 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.18

    0.18

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 4.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 180 ms

    180 ms

    Real visitors wait 180 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 362 ms

    362 ms

    Real visitors wait 362 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 3.4 MB in 156 requests

    3.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 156 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (56), images 928 KiB (30) and fonts 101 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (875 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (270 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.95 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.95 g of CO₂e: 114.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8389
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 7770
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (9 characters)

    Your title is only 9 characters: “WebAssign”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.webassign.net/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 13 internal links, 52 external

    The homepage links to 13 pages on webassign.net and 52 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “WebAssign is an online learning platform built by educators that provides affordable tools to empower confident students…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.webassign.net/index.html.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.webassign.net/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (402 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://www.webassign.net/v4cgi/selfenroll/classkey.html, https://www.webassign.net/features/textbook_collection.html, https://www.webassign.net/features/textbooks/physics_textbooks.html, https://www.webassign.net/features/textbooks/statistics_textbooks.html, https://www.webassign.net/features/textbooks/engineering_textbooks.html and https://www.webassign.net/features/textbooks/chemistry_textbooks.html have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.webassign.net/v4cgi/selfenroll/classkey.html has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://www.webassign.net/features/textbooks/physics_textbooks.html, https://www.webassign.net/features/textbooks/statistics_textbooks.html and https://www.webassign.net/features/textbooks/chemistry_textbooks.html took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 7 internal pages checked

    We fetched 7 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    6 pages of 7 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=25141590&Ver=2&mid=f970e745-0817-4f14-8aeb-743ca4e47f8c&bo=1&sid=cc322940c5c811f18439b38c4286e3ab&vid=cc325580c5c811f1bf73ad1b221c597f&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.

  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unsafe attempt to load URL https://webassign.com/wp-content/plugins/simple-social-icons/symbol-defs.svg from frame with…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 275 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 275 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More” and “Learn more”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Learn More” and “LEARN MORE”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 24 cookies set on arrival

    24

    Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 46 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 46 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at webassign.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on webassign.net, including 19 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25