Website review, no card needed

westking.ac.uk logo

westking.ac.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202630 issues · 85 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on westking.ac.uk, 7 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s1.4 sMay 9Oct 241.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
204 ms160 msMay 9Oct 24199 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026169 ms
May 16, 2026165 ms
May 23, 2026165 ms
May 30, 2026166 ms
Jun 6, 2026168 ms
Jun 13, 2026170 ms
Jun 20, 2026170 ms
Jun 27, 2026172 ms
Jul 4, 2026174 ms
Jul 11, 2026178 ms
Jul 18, 2026179 ms
Jul 25, 2026177 ms
Aug 1, 2026178 ms
Aug 8, 2026180 ms
Aug 15, 2026186 ms
Aug 22, 2026183 ms
Aug 29, 2026173 ms
Sep 5, 2026175 ms
Sep 12, 2026177 ms
Sep 19, 2026179 ms
Sep 26, 2026194 ms
Oct 3, 2026197 ms
Oct 10, 2026196 ms
Oct 17, 2026197 ms
Oct 24, 2026199 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of westking.ac.uk (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. westking.ac.uk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. westking.ac.uk at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. westking.ac.uk at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. westking.ac.uk at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. westking.ac.uk at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. westking.ac.uk at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. westking.ac.uk at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. westking.ac.uk at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix66
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    28 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 66

    66/100

    Your mobile performance score is 66 (desktop: 87). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 107 KiB

    About 107 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Hubspot and others), adding 970 KiB and 503 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 263 ms

    263 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 263 ms of main-thread work and 567 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    285 KiB

    About 285 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 2,122 HTML elements

    The page has 2,122 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 976 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    188 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (188 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    175 KiB

    7 images could be 175 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 113 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.6 s

    15.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Your largest element takes 5.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “As of 2024, we are proud to announce a bold new brand ident…”.

  • Speed Index: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 169 ms to 199 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 185 ms

    185 ms

    Real visitors wait 185 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 158 ms

    158 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 158 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.4 MB in 143 requests

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 143 requests on a phone: scripts 940 KiB (40), fonts 641 KiB (8) and images 549 KiB (35). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.67 g of CO₂e: 80.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9796
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 39 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • Title is long (94 characters)

    Your title is 94 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Capital City College (previously known as Westminster Kingsway College) - Capital City Co…”.

  • 263 internal links, 21 external

    The homepage links to 263 pages on westking.ac.uk and 21 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “We are proud to announce a bold new brand identity that unites all our colleges under one logo and offer a wide range o…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Capital City College (previously known as Westminster Kingsway College)”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.capitalccg.ac.uk/westking.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.capitalccg.ac.uk/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.capitalccg.ac.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,010 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix93
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.capitalccg.ac.uk/courses/higher-education-courses is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 100 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7791
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 29 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix63
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 8 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 471 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 471 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Apply/Enrol”, “How to apply” and “Contact”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Microsoft Clarity and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 28 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at westking.ac.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Uknoc

Company

Founded
2000

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on westking.ac.uk, including 15 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25