Website review, no card needed
wildaid.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202650 issues · 91 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on wildaid.org, 26 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
62DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 184 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 451 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 408 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 483 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 587 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 570 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 562 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 513 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 410 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 375 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 411 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 391 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 378 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 391 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 391 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 412 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
8.0 s · 2.1 MB11 images could be 2.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.0 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.5 s · 674 KiBAbout 674 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.3 s · 258 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (258 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 49
49/100Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 51). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, fundraiseup.com and Facebook and others), adding 1.4 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 516 ms
516 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 516 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 92 KiBAbout 92 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.1 s
A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 223 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.5 s
5.5 sReal visitors wait 5.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 872 ms
872 msReal visitors wait 872 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 1.00
1.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.9 s
24.9 sYour largest element takes 24.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Here’s How Technology is Helping Fight Illegal Fishing”.
Time to Interactive: 25.0 s
25.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.9 s
6.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sThe first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 179% slower for real visitors
+179%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 135 ms to 412 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 37% slower for real visitors
+37%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 520 ms
520 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 520 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.5 MB in 110 requests
4.5 MBYour homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 110 requests on a phone: images 2.8 MB (23), scripts 1.5 MB (46) and stylesheets 137 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
296 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example MapWithLogo-scaled.jpg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 330 px. Resized copies would save about 296 KiB.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (460 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
3 images in older formats
3 images (326 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.27 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.27 g of CO₂e: 152.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
4 images without alt text
4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (1 element)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 66 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 15 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
56 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 56 pages on wildaid.org and 16 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 145 characters
Your meta description is 145 characters: “WildAid works in 26+ countries to end the illegal wildlife trade and protect sharks, elephants, pangolins and our ocean…”.
Title: 50 characters
Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “WildAid | Wildlife & Marine Conservation Nonprofit”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://wildaid.org/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://wildaid.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (499 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://wildaid.org/llms.txt (195 KiB, 398 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://wildaid.org/about, https://wildaid.org/about/our-team and https://wildaid.org/news have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 36 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 small tap targets
5 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected token '<'”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 569 words of copy
The homepage carries about 569 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Learn More:” and “Subscribe”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
25 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wildaid.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Company
- Headquarters
- Montgomery Street
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on wildaid.org, including 23 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.