Website review, no card needed
willamette.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202634 issues · 87 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on willamette.edu, 10 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: google Tag Manager adds 2.2 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 144 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Google Tag Manager adds 2.2 s
2.2 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 2.2 s of main-thread work and 668 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
1.0 s · 283 KiB6 images could be 283 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 33
33/100Your mobile performance score is 33. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.5 s
A phone's processor spends 9.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, covecreekproductions.com and Facebook and others), adding 2.5 MB and 4.6 s of main-thread time.
covecreekproductions.com adds 903 ms
903 mscovecreekproductions.com costs a phone 903 ms of main-thread work and 906 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
977 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (977 KiB).
Facebook adds 712 ms
712 msFacebook costs a phone 712 ms of main-thread work and 281 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 649 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 496 KiBAbout 496 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
b-cdn.net adds 399 ms
399 msb-cdn.net costs a phone 399 ms of main-thread work and 650 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
350 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.
2,490 HTML elements
The page has 2,490 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Font display
200 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 17 KiBAbout 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
24 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 49 ms
49 msYour server sent the HTML in 49 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Total Blocking Time: 3.8 s
3.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 22.4 s
22.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.7 s
6.7 sYour largest element takes 6.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “A group of Willamette University students walking outside a…”.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors
+23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 5.0 s
5.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 134 ms
134 msReal visitors wait 134 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 392 ms
392 msReal visitors wait 392 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.093
0.093The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.093, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.2 MB in 88 requests
3.2 MBYour homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 88 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (28), images 982 KiB (16) and HTML 314 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
51 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20260925-wu-p1023080.webp at 1,144 px wide, shown at 368 px. Resized copies would save about 51 KiB.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.90 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.90 g of CO₂e: 107.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
209 internal links, 43 external
The homepage links to 209 pages on willamette.edu and 43 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 154 characters
Your meta description is 154 characters: “Willamette University is a private university located in Salem and Portland, Oregon. Learn more about our undergraduate…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Turn Knowledge Into Action”.
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Willamette University | Oregon's Top Private University”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://willamette.edu/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: CollegeOrUniversity.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://willamette.edu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,844 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://willamette.edu/llms.txt (14 KiB, 116 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 15 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://willamette.edu/request-information/index.html, whose canonical is https://willamette.edu/request-information. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 85 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=5065847&Ver=2&mid=bea282ef-a93e-4e0d-8e09-d3cd7af6435c&bo=1&sid=cb244fa0d35111f1bf5169c3e48225c4&vid=cb249df0d35111f1af6a1386e85fa316&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg=.
1 small tap target
1 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page is smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 614 words of copy
The homepage carries about 614 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
19 calls to action
The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Request Info”, “Apply” and “Apply Close Apply Menu”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
33 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 33 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at willamette.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Employees
- 870
- Founded
- 1842
- Headquarters
- Salem
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on willamette.edu, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.