Website review, no card needed

williambuck.com logo

williambuck.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202639 issues · 84 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on williambuck.com, 13 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.2 sMay 9Oct 243.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.8 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
202 ms141 msMay 9Oct 24187 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026195 ms
May 16, 2026155 ms
May 23, 2026152 ms
May 30, 2026148 ms
Jun 6, 2026151 ms
Jun 13, 2026178 ms
Jun 20, 2026184 ms
Jun 27, 2026184 ms
Jul 4, 2026176 ms
Jul 11, 2026170 ms
Jul 18, 2026172 ms
Jul 25, 2026182 ms
Aug 1, 2026190 ms
Aug 8, 2026189 ms
Aug 15, 2026195 ms
Aug 22, 2026193 ms
Aug 29, 2026188 ms
Sep 5, 2026187 ms
Sep 12, 2026189 ms
Sep 19, 2026186 ms
Sep 26, 2026176 ms
Oct 3, 2026178 ms
Oct 10, 2026177 ms
Oct 17, 2026178 ms
Oct 24, 2026187 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of williambuck.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. williambuck.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. williambuck.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. williambuck.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. williambuck.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  5. williambuck.com at 4.9 s4.9 s
  6. williambuck.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  7. williambuck.com at 6.9 s6.9 s
  8. williambuck.com at 7.9 s7.9 s

Speed

11 to fix24
  • Improve image delivery

    3.6 s · 710 KiB

    1 image could be 710 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 179 KiB

    About 179 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 24

    24/100

    Your mobile performance score is 24. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,882 HTML elements

    The page has 3,882 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Azure Web Services and Clarity and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    1.1 MB

    1.1 MB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 933 ms

    933 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 933 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    806 KiB

    About 806 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    369 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (369 KiB).

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 264 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 395 ms

    395 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 395 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.8 s

    9.8 s

    Your largest element takes 9.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Your Future Ready Playbook Middle market businesses face mo…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.0 s

    23.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.785

    0.785

    The layout shifts by 0.785 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 8.6 s

    8.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 696 ms

    696 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 696 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.23

    0.23

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.23 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 195 ms to 187 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 171 ms

    171 ms

    Real visitors wait 171 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 743 ms

    743 ms

    Real visitors wait 743 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.5 MB in 194 requests

    3.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 194 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (64), images 1.0 MB (16) and stylesheets 261 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.99 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.99 g of CO₂e: 119.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8592
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (33 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 33 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 42 links without text

    42 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 63 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8588
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“William Buck Australia” and “Accountants & Business Advisors Australia & New Z…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 8 links with vague text

    8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 291 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 291 pages on williambuck.com and 17 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “William Buck is a leading firm of accountants & advisors with offices across Australia & New Zealand. Find out how we c…”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Accountants & Business Advisors Australia & New Zealand”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://williambuck.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.williambuck.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://williambuck.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (7,122 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://williambuck.com/contact-us is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://williambuck.com/resources/client-portal, https://williambuck.com/contact-us and https://williambuck.com/services/international-services have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://williambuck.com/services/audit-assurance/sustainability-reporting, whose canonical is https://williambuck.com/services/business-advisory/sustainability-reporting. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://williambuck.com/services/audit-assurance/sustainability-reporting took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 130 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 8191
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “jQuery(...).simpleMobileMenu is not a function”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    28 of 33 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 630 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 630 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Download the guide”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Contact” and “Download the guide ⭳”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Hotjar.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 31 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at williambuck.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on williambuck.com, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25