Website review, no card needed

wlwt.com logo

wlwt.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202640 issues · 90 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on wlwt.com, 15 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s2.0 sApr 18Oct 32.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20262.2 s
Apr 25, 20262.3 s
May 2, 20262.3 s
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
192 ms140 msApr 18Oct 3179 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026159 ms
Apr 25, 2026157 ms
May 2, 2026154 ms
May 9, 2026147 ms
May 16, 2026146 ms
May 23, 2026146 ms
May 30, 2026146 ms
Jun 6, 2026149 ms
Jun 13, 2026154 ms
Jun 20, 2026158 ms
Jun 27, 2026163 ms
Jul 4, 2026165 ms
Jul 11, 2026162 ms
Jul 18, 2026163 ms
Jul 25, 2026163 ms
Aug 1, 2026170 ms
Aug 8, 2026175 ms
Aug 15, 2026181 ms
Aug 22, 2026180 ms
Aug 29, 2026179 ms
Sep 5, 2026185 ms
Sep 12, 2026185 ms
Sep 19, 2026186 ms
Sep 26, 2026186 ms
Oct 3, 2026179 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wlwt.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wlwt.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. wlwt.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. wlwt.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. wlwt.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. wlwt.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. wlwt.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. wlwt.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. wlwt.com at 3.5 s3.5 s

Speed

12 to fix26
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 2.2 MB

    About 2.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.0 s · 1.0 MB

    36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.0 MB).

  • Main-thread work: 11.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 11.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 26

    26/100

    Your mobile performance score is 26 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (weather.com, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 3.4 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.

  • weather.com adds 774 ms

    774 ms

    weather.com costs a phone 774 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    662 KiB

    10 images could be 662 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 545 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 329 ms

    329 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 329 ms of main-thread work and 545 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 244 ms

    244 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 244 ms of main-thread work and 311 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • htvapps.com adds 148 ms

    148 ms

    htvapps.com costs a phone 148 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 46 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 46 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 58 but mobile only 26. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.1 s

    19.1 s

    Your largest element takes 19.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 41.1 s

    41.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 41.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 16 images without width and height

    16 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 159 ms to 179 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 174 ms

    174 ms

    Real visitors wait 174 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 278 ms

    278 ms

    Real visitors wait 278 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.02

    0.02

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.02, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 6.7 MB in 252 requests

    6.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.7 MB in 252 requests on a phone: scripts 3.6 MB (67), images 1.3 MB (91) and other files 957 KiB (72). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    225 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example thumb_1080x1920.0000001.jpg at 1,080 px wide, shown at 120 px. Resized copies would save about 225 KiB.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (193 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (54 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.90 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.90 g of CO₂e: 228.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8893
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 16 links without text

    16 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (7 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 7798
  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 126 internal links, 22 external

    The homepage links to 126 pages on wlwt.com and 22 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 102 characters

    Your meta description is 102 characters: “Stay in the know. Get the latest Cincinnati news, weather and sports from the team at Ohio’s own WLWT.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “WLWT News 5 and Weather”.

  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Cincinnati News, Weather and Sports - Ohio News - WLWT Channel 5”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.wlwt.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: ItemList.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wlwt.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 2 AI answer engine crawlers

    2 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (983 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    /nowcast, /subscribe and /traffic have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /memorials, whose canonical is /article/chptr/69019245. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /memorials, /privacy-notice and /terms-of-use have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /memorials has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 81 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5483
  • 11 small tap targets

    11 of 33 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported. [obj…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 978 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 978 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Download” and “Contact Us”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Ketch) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 42 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 42 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Ketch

    A consent management tool (Ketch) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wlwt.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on wlwt.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25