Website review, no card needed

wvc.edu logo

wvc.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202633 issues · 79 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on wvc.edu, 14 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.2 sMay 9Oct 241.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.4 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.3 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Oct 24, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
87 ms77 msMay 9Oct 2479 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202684 ms
May 16, 202686 ms
May 23, 202684 ms
May 30, 202684 ms
Jun 6, 202681 ms
Jun 13, 202679 ms
Jun 20, 202679 ms
Jun 27, 202679 ms
Jul 4, 202679 ms
Jul 11, 202678 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202678 ms
Aug 1, 202679 ms
Aug 8, 202679 ms
Aug 15, 202680 ms
Aug 22, 202679 ms
Aug 29, 202678 ms
Sep 5, 202678 ms
Sep 12, 202678 ms
Sep 19, 202680 ms
Sep 26, 202685 ms
Oct 3, 202686 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202684 ms
Oct 24, 202679 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wvc.edu (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wvc.edu at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. wvc.edu at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. wvc.edu at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. wvc.edu at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. wvc.edu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. wvc.edu at 3.1 s3.1 s
  7. wvc.edu at 3.6 s3.6 s
  8. wvc.edu at 4.1 s4.1 s

Speed

7 to fix56
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    17.8 s · 10.8 MB

    43 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10.8 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.0 s · 6.3 MB

    7 images could be 6.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 177 KiB

    About 177 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 73). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 50 KiB

    About 50 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • LiveChat adds 53 ms

    53 ms

    LiveChat costs a phone 53 ms of main-thread work and 366 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (weglot.com, LiveChat and Google Fonts and others), adding 829 KiB and 137 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 81 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    44 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 389 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 100 ms

    100 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 100 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.51

    0.51

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.51 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 40.9 s

    40.9 s

    Your largest element takes 40.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Find Your Program Our programs can prepare you for any care…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 42.7 s

    42.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 42.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.6 s

    10.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 84 ms to 79 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 90 ms

    90 ms

    Real visitors wait 90 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 570 ms

    570 ms

    Real visitors wait 570 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 22 ms

    22 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 22 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 11.6 MB in 71 requests

    11.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.6 MB in 71 requests on a phone: images 10.6 MB (22), scripts 501 KiB (26) and fonts 342 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images over 500 KB

    6 images weigh 7.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    4.2 MB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Checkerboard-Omak-library-1820x1213.jpg at 3,600 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 4.2 MB.

  • 14 images in older formats

    14 images (9.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (3.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.29 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.29 g of CO₂e: 395.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

Google 100100
  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 14 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 0 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 7779
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 5 links with vague text

    5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 130 internal links, 49 external

    The homepage links to 130 pages on wvc.edu and 49 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Your journey starts here!”.

  • Title: 35 characters

    Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Welcome to Wenatchee Valley College”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.wvc.edu/index.html.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wvc.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://wvc.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (962 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://wvc.edu/learn/course-catalog/index.html, https://wvc.edu/current-students/index.html, https://wvc.edu/apply/pay/index.html, https://wvc.edu/about/campuses/safety-security/index.html, https://wvc.edu/apply/pay/student-employment/index.html and https://wvc.edu/student-life-support/technology-support/index.html and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://wvc.edu/student-life-support/technology-support/student-landing.html, whose canonical is https://wvc.edu/404.html. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 61 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 18 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 431 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 431 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get Started”.

  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Update Contact Info”, “Work Order Request” and “Apply”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 4 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wvc.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery

Company

Employees
324
Founded
1939

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on wvc.edu, including 14 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25