Website review, no card needed
wwf.ca website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202644 issues · 86 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on wwf.ca, 19 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67D- #82,738 of 92,105 reviewed websitesbeats 9%
- #46,145 of 48,845 online storesbeats 4%
- #42,048 of 44,030 Shopify storesbeats 4%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 133 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 200 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
5.5 s · 3.3 MB18 images could be 3.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
7.2 s18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 7.2 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.9 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.9 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.1 s · 588 KiB20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (588 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s
1.2 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.7 s
A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Hotjar and others), adding 3.0 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
Facebook adds 392 ms
392 msFacebook costs a phone 392 ms of main-thread work and 466 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 112 KiBAbout 112 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
FontAwesome CDN adds 97 ms
97 msFontAwesome CDN costs a phone 97 ms of main-thread work and 513 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 216 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
36 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 36 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
18 KiB18 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
15 KiB15 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 10.8 s
10.8 sThe first text or image appears after 10.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 37.7 s
37.7 sYour largest element takes 37.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 16.6 s
16.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 16.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 38.5 s
38.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 38.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 947 ms
947 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 947 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 238 ms
238 msReal visitors wait 238 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.13
0.13For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 50% slower for real visitors
+50%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 137 ms to 200 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.13
0.13The layout shifts by 0.13 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 604 ms
604 msReal visitors wait 604 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.5 MB in 168 requests
8.5 MBYour homepage downloads 8.5 MB in 168 requests on a phone: images 4.8 MB (34), scripts 3.4 MB (53) and stylesheets 138 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images over 500 KB
4 images weigh 2.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
8 images far larger than shown
2.1 MB8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example WWF.ca_MarketingBox_1200x750_REVISED_LeafSheep.png at 2,400 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 2.1 MB.
17 images in older formats
17 images (3.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
12 images below the first screen load straight away
12 images further down the page (1.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit
2.40 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.40 g of CO₂e: 288.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Form elements should have a visible label (4 elements)
Form elements should have a visible label: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Table header text should not be empty (3 elements)
Table header text should not be empty: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (2 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 23 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
7 H1 headlines
There are 7 <h1> headlines (“Unbe-leaf-able!”, “Bringing Bison Back” and “SMILE FOR OUR NEW ADOPTABLE SPECIES”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
21 links with vague text
21 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Article, ImageObject, NGO and Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Person: sameAs is not an absolute URL ("[email protected]")”.
151 internal links, 116 external
The homepage links to 151 pages on wwf.ca and 116 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 150 characters
Your meta description is 150 characters: “WWF-Canada is an evidence-based conservation organization working to conserve species at risk, protect threatened habit…”.
Title: 35 characters
Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “World Wildlife Fund Canada | WWF.CA”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://wwf.ca/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://wwf.ca/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://wwf.ca/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,072 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without an H1
https://wwf.ca/leaders and https://wwf.ca/experts have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 72 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
A 12-field form
Your longest form asks for 12 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 830 words of copy
The homepage carries about 830 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE” and “SHOP NOW”.
19 calls to action
The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Apply for Funding” and “Shop”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight.
Privacy and tracking
12 trackers load before any consent
12Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 7 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
49 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 49 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wwf.ca, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify Plus
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Hiring
- Hiring
- 1 open role
- Job board
- careers page
- Careers page
- wwf.ca/jobs (opens in a new tab)
Company
- Employees
- 110
- Founded
- 1967
- Headquarters
- Toronto
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on wwf.ca, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.