Website review, no card needed

wwf.sg logo

wwf.sg website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202643 issues · 93 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on wwf.sg, 20 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.0 sMay 2Oct 32.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.4 s
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
185 ms131 msMay 2Oct 3175 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026148 ms
May 9, 2026139 ms
May 16, 2026138 ms
May 23, 2026138 ms
May 30, 2026142 ms
Jun 6, 2026148 ms
Jun 13, 2026149 ms
Jun 20, 2026155 ms
Jun 27, 2026156 ms
Jul 4, 2026155 ms
Jul 11, 2026152 ms
Jul 18, 2026140 ms
Jul 25, 2026138 ms
Aug 1, 2026137 ms
Aug 8, 2026153 ms
Aug 15, 2026159 ms
Aug 22, 2026160 ms
Aug 29, 2026179 ms
Sep 5, 2026171 ms
Sep 12, 2026162 ms
Sep 19, 2026164 ms
Sep 26, 2026166 ms
Oct 3, 2026175 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wwf.sg (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wwf.sg at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. wwf.sg at 2.8 s2.8 s
  3. wwf.sg at 4.3 s4.3 s
  4. wwf.sg at 5.7 s5.7 s
  5. wwf.sg at 7.1 s7.1 s
  6. wwf.sg at 8.5 s8.5 s
  7. wwf.sg at 10.0 s10.0 s
  8. wwf.sg at 11.4 s11.4 s

Speed

15 to fix35
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.0 s · 954 KiB

    About 954 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.3 s · 540 KiB

    14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (540 KiB).

  • Document request latency

    2.6 s

    The HTML itself could arrive about 2.6 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    2.6 s

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 2.6 s on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Font display

    1.4 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.4 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 35

    35/100

    Your mobile performance score is 35 (desktop: 63). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Server response: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Your server takes 2.7 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Stripe and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 435 ms

    435 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 435 ms of main-thread work and 625 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 41 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Facebook adds 341 ms

    341 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 341 ms of main-thread work and 267 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Stripe adds 274 ms

    274 ms

    Stripe costs a phone 274 ms of main-thread work and 271 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,917 HTML elements

    The page has 2,917 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 26 KiB

    26 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 174 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    170 KiB

    3 images could be 170 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    145 KiB

    About 145 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 63 but mobile only 35. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 36.1 s

    36.1 s

    Your largest element takes 36.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 18.8 s

    18.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 18.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 36.2 s

    36.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 36.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 148 ms to 175 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 160 ms

    160 ms

    Real visitors wait 160 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 503 ms

    503 ms

    Real visitors wait 503 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix47
  • Page weight: 6.4 MB in 158 requests

    6.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.4 MB in 158 requests on a phone: images 3.7 MB (27), scripts 2.2 MB (82) and fonts 320 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 1.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Homepage-Banner-MYAFY26-Mobile.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.82 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.82 g of CO₂e: 218.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8289
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 37 images without alt text

    37 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 7795
  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 195 internal links, 21 external

    The homepage links to 195 pages on wwf.sg and 21 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “WWF Singapore tackles climate change, deforestation, and illegal wildlife trade, advancing sustainability through colla…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “BECOME A DONOR”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “WWF Singapore | Building a Future in Harmony With Nature”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.wwf.sg/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wwf.sg/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.wwf.sg/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,583 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.wwf.sg/climate/net-zero-carbon-stage is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://www.wwf.sg/our-work, https://www.wwf.sg/climate, https://www.wwf.sg/climate/net-zero-carbon-stage, https://www.wwf.sg/climate/sustainable-finance, https://www.wwf.sg/sustainability-circular-economy and https://www.wwf.sg/sustainability-circular-economy/sustainable-palm-oil and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.wwf.sg/our-work, https://www.wwf.sg/climate, https://www.wwf.sg/climate/net-zero-carbon-stage, https://www.wwf.sg/climate/sustainable-finance, https://www.wwf.sg/sustainability-circular-economy and https://www.wwf.sg/sustainability-circular-economy/sustainable-palm-oil and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.wwf.sg/nature-biodiversity/illegal-wildlife-trade took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error in function handleUserSession: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'addEventListener')”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 27-field form

    Your longest form asks for 27 fields (26 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 496 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 496 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “SHOP” and “LEARN MORE”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 17 cookies set on arrival

    17

    Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 21 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wwf.sg, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Company

Employees
116
Founded
2006

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on wwf.sg, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25