Website review, no card needed

wwf.id logo

wwf.id website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202647 issues · 83 checks

This review found 47 issues worth fixing on wwf.id, 18 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.4 s2.9 sMay 9Oct 243.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.7 s
May 16, 20264.0 s
May 23, 20263.8 s
May 30, 20263.8 s
Jun 6, 20263.8 s
Jun 13, 20264.2 s
Jun 20, 20265.4 s
Jun 27, 20265.2 s
Jul 4, 20264.7 s
Jul 11, 20264.4 s
Jul 18, 20264.1 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20264.2 s
Aug 8, 20264.8 s
Aug 15, 20265.1 s
Aug 22, 20266.0 s
Aug 29, 20265.7 s
Sep 5, 20265.1 s
Sep 12, 20265.2 s
Sep 19, 20265.2 s
Sep 26, 20265.0 s
Oct 3, 20264.8 s
Oct 10, 20264.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
119 ms84 msMay 9Oct 2497 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202699 ms
May 16, 202691 ms
May 23, 202688 ms
May 30, 202694 ms
Jun 6, 2026101 ms
Jun 13, 2026105 ms
Jun 20, 2026114 ms
Jun 27, 2026115 ms
Jul 4, 2026110 ms
Jul 11, 2026108 ms
Jul 18, 2026106 ms
Jul 25, 202696 ms
Aug 1, 202698 ms
Aug 8, 2026113 ms
Aug 15, 2026105 ms
Aug 22, 2026103 ms
Aug 29, 2026103 ms
Sep 5, 2026102 ms
Sep 12, 2026110 ms
Sep 19, 2026110 ms
Sep 26, 2026106 ms
Oct 3, 2026102 ms
Oct 10, 202688 ms
Oct 17, 202694 ms
Oct 24, 202697 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wwf.id (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wwf.id at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. wwf.id at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. wwf.id at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. wwf.id at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. wwf.id at 2.4 s2.4 s
  6. wwf.id at 2.9 s2.9 s
  7. wwf.id at 3.4 s3.4 s
  8. wwf.id at 3.9 s3.9 s

Speed

7 to fix44
  • Improve image delivery

    9.1 s · 10.1 MB

    13 images could be 10.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.6 s · 346 KiB

    About 346 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 s · 324 KiB

    About 324 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Font display

    600 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 600 ms).

  • FontAwesome CDN adds 111 ms

    111 ms

    FontAwesome CDN costs a phone 111 ms of main-thread work and 490 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome CDN and Google Fonts and others), adding 812 KiB and 293 ms of main-thread time.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 147 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    6 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 359 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.1 s

    20.1 s

    Your largest element takes 20.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Image 1”.

  • Speed Index: 16.1 s

    16.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 16.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 32.4 s

    32.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 32.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.182

    0.182

    The layout shifts by 0.182 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 19 images without width and height

    19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 99 ms to 97 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 100 ms

    100 ms

    Real visitors wait 100 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors

    -13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 194 ms

    194 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 194 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

6 to fix19
  • Page weight: 16.2 MB in 33 requests

    16.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 16.2 MB in 33 requests on a phone: images 14.6 MB (18), scripts 1.1 MB (5) and stylesheets 382 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images over 500 KB

    8 images weigh 12.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 10 images far larger than shown

    4.1 MB

    10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Banner Website wwf.id Harapan untuk bumi (Image only).png at 1,400 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 4.1 MB.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (14.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (3.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Selamat Datang di WWF-Indonesia!_WWF-Indonesia.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 4.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.60 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.60 g of CO₂e: 552.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8691
  • 6 buttons without a name

    6 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 7 tap targets too small

    7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 10067
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “WWF-INDONESIA”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (515 characters)

    Your meta description is 515 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://wwf.id/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 60 internal links, 26 external

    The homepage links to 60 pages on wwf.id and 26 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://wwf.id/id.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://wwf.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (427 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix76
  • 4 pages share a title

    https://wwf.id/id, https://wwf.id/en/corporate-03, https://wwf.id/id/corporate-03 and / all use the title “WWF-INDONESIA”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://wwf.id/id/contact and https://wwf.id/id/about-us/faq have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://wwf.id/id/corporate-03 and / use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://wwf.id/en/corporate-03, whose canonical is https://wwf.id/en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 9 pages without an H1

    https://wwf.id/en/corporate-03, https://wwf.id/id/corporate-03, /, https://wwf.id/id/learn/climate-market, https://wwf.id/id/learn/forest-wildlife and https://wwf.id/id/learn/marine-fisheries and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 50 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 32 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 353 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 353 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Apply” and “SHOP”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wwf.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 47 issues on wwf.id, including 17 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25