Website review, no card needed
xstrahl.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202622 issues · 77 checks
This review found 22 issues worth fixing on xstrahl.com, 12 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 103 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.4 s22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 265 KiBAbout 265 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 61). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Adobe TypeKit adds 0 ms
0 msAdobe TypeKit costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 362 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 21 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (21 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 38 KiBAbout 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, cdn-cookieyes.com and Bing Ads and others), adding 651 KiB and 105 ms of main-thread time.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 65 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
31 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.2 s
A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 628 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 55 ms
55 msYour server sent the HTML in 55 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 1.00
1.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.7 s
12.7 sYour largest element takes 12.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Inspiring Science, Advancing Care Xstrahl delivers medical …”.
First Contentful Paint: 5.8 s
5.8 sThe first text or image appears after 5.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 12.7 s
12.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.4 s
7.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.7 s
3.7 sReal visitors wait 3.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 103 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 103 ms
103 msReal visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 28 ms
28 msScripts block the page for only 28 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.54 g of CO₂e: 64.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.9 MB in 99 requests
1.9 MBYour homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 99 requests on a phone: scripts 748 KiB (35), images 614 KiB (23) and fonts 460 KiB (11). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 18 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
10 links with vague text
10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
125 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 125 pages on xstrahl.com and 5 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 141 characters
Your meta description is 141 characters: “A leading radiation equipment company, Xstrahl designs and manufactures X-ray systems for use in radiation therapy and …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Inspiring Science, Advancing Care”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Radiation Research & eBt Therapy Equipment Company | Xstrahl”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://xstrahl.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://xstrahl.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,241 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://xstrahl.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 41 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 54 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187008855&tm=wpp_1.0.7&Ver=2&mid=fe68f13e-dbca-4714-b6c5-cec40a48aa25&bo=1&sid=92acad40ce9611f1823c8fd5defb8e8d&vid=92acdf40ce9611f1918873fa615dcc7a&vids=1&msclkid=N&p.
13 small tap targets
13 of 22 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
5 low-resolution images
5 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
A 9-field form
Your longest form asks for 9 fields (4 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 621 words of copy
The homepage carries about 621 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “REQUEST INFO”.
17 calls to action
The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Request Support”, “Request Info” and “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at xstrahl.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 22 issues on xstrahl.com, including 13 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.