Website review, no card needed
yeelight.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202641 issues · 65 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on yeelight.com, 15 of them high impact, across 65 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
55FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 7.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 84 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.1 s
4.1 s
6.2 s
8.3 s
10.3 s
12.4 s
14.5 s
16.5 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.6 s · 25.0 MB70 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (25.0 MB).
Improve image delivery
3.9 MB13 images could be 3.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 750 ms.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 84 KiBAbout 84 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (Baidu Analytics), adding 13 KiB and 24 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
11 KiBAbout 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.4 s
A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 325 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.6 s
5.6 sReal visitors wait 5.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 1.00
1.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 4.8 s
4.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.372
1.372The layout shifts by 1.372 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 12.7 s
12.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.4 s
3.4 sYour largest element takes 3.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “设计 · 科技 · 生活”. Most of its time is element render delay (7.9 s).
21 images without width and height
21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors
-18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 84 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors
-24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.6 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Time to Interactive: 3.4 s
3.4 sThe page is fully interactive after 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 26.1 MB in 76 requests
26.1 MBYour homepage downloads 26.1 MB in 76 requests on a phone: media 20.4 MB (6), images 5.3 MB (35) and scripts 318 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 7.4 g of CO₂ per visit
7.40 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.40 g of CO₂e: 888.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (43 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 43 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (8 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
1 checks passed
19 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 26 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 19 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (17 characters)
Your title is only 17 characters: “易来全屋智能家居 设计·科技·生活”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://cn.yeelight.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
2 checks passed
Meta description: 102 characters
Your meta description is 102 characters: “Yeelight易来成立于2012年,是全球知名的智能家居品牌,深度融合智能交互科技与空间美学设计,与全球主流物联网协议的深度适配,以开放智能生态,为用户打造高品质、智能化、个性化的全屋智能家居解决方案。”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://cn.yeelight.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 35 words
The homepage has only about 35 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 other company contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at yeelight.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Ace As Ap Ace
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on yeelight.com, including 14 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.