Website review, no card needed
zacks.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202648 issues · 82 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on zacks.com, 22 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: avoid multiple page redirects. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
61DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 164 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 164 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 164 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 165 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 194 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Avoid multiple page redirects
14.2 sThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 14.2 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Main-thread work: 12.4 s
A phone's processor spends 12.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 34
34/100Your mobile performance score is 34 (desktop: 47). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
830 ms · 1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 830 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 408 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
4 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
1 checks passed
Server response: 88 ms
88 msYour server sent the HTML in 88 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.2 s
11.2 sYour largest element takes 11.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Speed Index: 17.0 s
17.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 61.2 s
61.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 61.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s
1.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 239 ms
239 msReal visitors wait 239 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors
+19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 164 ms to 194 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.08
0.08For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 523 ms
523 msReal visitors wait 523 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.075
0.075The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.075, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.8 MB in 1,086 requests
6.8 MBYour homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 1,086 requests on a phone: scripts 4.6 MB (127), images 1.2 MB (303) and other files 686 KiB (543). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.94 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.94 g of CO₂e: 232.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (5 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Required ARIA attributes must be provided (2 elements)
Required ARIA attributes must be provided: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (16 elements)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (5 elements)
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (35 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 35 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
59 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 73 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 59 passed and 14 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Page is set to noindex
The robots meta tag says “noindex, nofollow”: Google is told not to list this page at all.
No page title
Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
3 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Pardon Our Interruption”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.zacks.com/news_all_articles_sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
4%A phone browser shows 2,482 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 110. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.zacks.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
39 small tap targets
39 of 181 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
31 third-party cookies
31 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “ga is not defined”.
14 distorted images
14 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
8 low-resolution images
8 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Requests the notification permission on page load
Requests the notification permission on page load.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,482 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,482 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join Now” and “Quote or Search”.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zacks.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on zacks.com, including 12 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.