Website review, no card needed
zanducare.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202627 issues · 75 checks
This review found 27 issues worth fixing on zanducare.com, 6 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82B- #30,807 of 108,510 reviewed websitesbeats 66%
- #20,558 of 61,557 online storesbeats 60%
- #19,891 of 56,179 Shopify storesbeats 58%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 326 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 334 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 337 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 330 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 332 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 335 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 348 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 359 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 358 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 357 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 336 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 284 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 290 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 299 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
6,272 HTML elements
The page has 6,272 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 80
80/100Your mobile performance score is 80. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 735 KiB24 images could be 735 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 21 KiBAbout 21 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
gokwik.co adds 70 ms
70 msgokwik.co costs a phone 70 ms of main-thread work and 479 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, gokwik.co and Shopify and others), adding 891 KiB and 305 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
222 KiB10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (222 KiB).
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 180 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
121 KiBAbout 121 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Render-blocking requests
100 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 100 ms.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 408 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 24 ms
24 msYour server sent the HTML in 24 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.1 s
5.1 sYour largest element takes 5.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Real-user INP: 282 ms
282 msReal visitors wait 282 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 875 ms
875 msReal visitors wait 875 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 7.2 s
7.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 7.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
19 images without width and height
19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
9 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.08
0.08For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 326 ms to 299 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 26% faster for real visitors
-26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.6 s
1.6 sThe first text or image appears after 1.6 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Speed Index: 2.2 s
2.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.2 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 89 ms
89 msScripts block the page for only 89 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.02
0.02The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.02, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.9 MB in 114 requests
2.9 MBYour homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 114 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (72), scripts 845 KiB (26) and HTML 134 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.81 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 97.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values (1 element).
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 165 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
25 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 27 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 25 passed and 2 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “ZanduCare - Shop Authentic Ayurvedic Products Online | Official Zandu”.
Meta description is long (163 characters)
Your meta description is 163 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
225 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 225 pages on zanducare.com and 5 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “ZanduCare”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://zanducare.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: OnlineStore, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://zanducare.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://zanducare.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://zanducare.com/collections/double-the-josh-double-the-power is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://zanducare.com/collections/all-products has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 83 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'replaceChild')”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 46 words
The homepage has only about 46 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Buy 1 Get 1 Free”, “Shop All” and “Track Order”.
93 short forms
93 short forms (0 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
22 cookies set on arrival
22Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
31 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zanducare.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Securify · Judge Me Reviews · Cooee · Microsoft Clarity · Gokwik Cart Slide Cart Drawer · Wishlink · Verifast Sales Assistant · amazonaws.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 27 issues on zanducare.com, including 11 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.