Website review, no card needed
zeelool.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202644 issues · 85 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on zeelool.com, 15 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
62DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 311 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 308 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 310 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 323 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 345 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 365 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 386 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 394 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 397 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 402 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 402 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 401 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 396 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 388 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 386 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 387 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 386 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 390 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 392 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 388 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 383 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 372 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 361 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 347 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.7 s
2.5 s
3.4 s
4.2 s
5.1 s
5.9 s
6.8 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Mobile performance score: 24
24/100Your mobile performance score is 24 (desktop: 33). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.1 s
A phone's processor spends 6.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 930 KiBAbout 930 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (trustdecision.com, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
700 ms · 525 KiB26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (525 KiB).
Improve image delivery
550 ms · 239 KiB6 images could be 239 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.
trustdecision.com adds 583 ms
583 mstrustdecision.com costs a phone 583 ms of main-thread work and 174 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 320 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 266 ms
266 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 266 ms of main-thread work and 493 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 61 ms
61 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 61 ms of main-thread work and 356 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 70 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 70 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
17 KiBAbout 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 30 ms
30 msYour server sent the HTML in 30 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.78
0.78For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.78 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.8 s
9.8 sYour largest element takes 9.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “TopBanner1”.
Time to Interactive: 32.4 s
32.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.3 s
11.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.481
0.481The layout shifts by 0.481 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 627 ms
627 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 627 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 337 ms
337 msReal visitors wait 337 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 312 ms to 347 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.7 MB in 335 requests
5.7 MBYour homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 335 requests on a phone: scripts 3.1 MB (129), other files 1.1 MB (96) and images 1.1 MB (98). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
df792501b32cb234c9562de06705fb8d.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
5 images far larger than shown
163 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example b25f527299626d3a81edbbccd12fc46f.jpg at 690 px wide, shown at 179 px. Resized copies would save about 163 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (122 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.61 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.61 g of CO₂e: 193.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (14 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (2 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (11 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 33 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
178 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 178 pages on zeelool.com and 12 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 154 characters
Your meta description is 154 characters: “ZEELOOL is your go-to for stylish, affordable glasses online — eyeglass frames for women and men, free virtual try-on, …”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “ZEELOOL: Stylish Glasses & Prescription Eyeglasses Online”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.zeelool.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.zeelool.com/sitemap_pc.xml.
AI search readiness
Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers
Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
3 checks passed
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (734 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.zeelool.com/llms.txt (17 KiB, 36 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
11 pages without an H1
https://www.zeelool.com/accessibility-statement, https://www.zeelool.com/goods-list/70, https://www.zeelool.com/goods-list/81, https://www.zeelool.com/goods-list/80, https://www.zeelool.com/goods-list/188 and https://www.zeelool.com/goods-list/100 and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 143 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “[WebEmarsysSDK] TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register') Init failed!”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
52 of 58 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 257 words of copy
The homepage carries about 257 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Dismiss app download banner” and “Download APP”.
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Shop Now”, “Subscribe” and “Contact Us”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
20 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zeelool.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on zeelool.com, including 23 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.