Website review, no card needed
zoo.se website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202635 issues · 77 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on zoo.se, 14 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 303 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 303 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 304 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 325 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 330 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 331 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 333 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 336 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 332 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 330 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 330 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 333 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 261 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 6.9 s
A phone's processor spends 6.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
6,003 HTML elements
The page has 6,003 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 61). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 768 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
306 KiBAbout 306 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Google Tag Manager adds 255 ms
255 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 255 ms of main-thread work and 370 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, getflowbox.com and lipscore.com and others), adding 665 KiB and 378 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 7 KiB1 image could be 7 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
90 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (90 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
30 KiBAbout 30 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
18 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 259 ms
259 msYour server sent the HTML in 259 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Total Blocking Time: 2.2 s
2.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 13.7 s
13.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.5 s
8.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 456 ms
456 msReal visitors wait 456 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.20
0.20For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.20 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.4 s
3.4 sYour largest element takes 3.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 303 ms to 261 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.48 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.48 g of CO₂e: 57.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 1.7 MB in 179 requests
1.7 MBYour homepage downloads 1.7 MB in 179 requests on a phone: scripts 1.0 MB (65), images 380 KiB (98) and HTML 192 KiB (2). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (365 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 365 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
16 links without text
16 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 6 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “Organization: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
65 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 65 pages on zoo.se and 0 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 142 characters
Your meta description is 142 characters: “Köp allt du behöver till dina husdjur online & i butik hos djuraffären ZOO.se! ✓ Stort sortiment ✓ Snabb leverans ✓ Gra…”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Djuraffär & djurbutik - online & fysiska butiker | ZOO.se”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.zoo.se/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.zoo.se/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
26%A phone browser shows 1,936 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 501. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
Organization data is thin (1 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.zoo.se/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
4 pages without an H1
https://www.zoo.se/hund, https://www.zoo.se/katt, https://www.zoo.se/kampanj and https://www.zoo.se/hitta-butik have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages slow to respond
https://www.zoo.se/varumarken, https://www.zoo.se/veterinara-tjanster, https://www.zoo.se/hitta-butik and https://www.zoo.se/djurfakta took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 502 ()”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
141 of 143 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,936 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,936 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zoo.se, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Hiring
- Hiring
- 9 open roles
- Teams
- Engineering (7)
- Job board
- greenhouse
- Careers page
- boards.greenhouse.io/zoo (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on zoo.se, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.