Website review, no card needed

zusje.nl logo

zusje.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202640 issues · 85 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on zusje.nl, 14 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s1.3 sMay 9Oct 241.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
126 ms82 msMay 9Oct 24121 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202688 ms
May 16, 202688 ms
May 23, 202688 ms
May 30, 202689 ms
Jun 6, 202689 ms
Jun 13, 202691 ms
Jun 20, 202692 ms
Jun 27, 202692 ms
Jul 4, 202692 ms
Jul 11, 202692 ms
Jul 18, 202692 ms
Jul 25, 202692 ms
Aug 1, 202691 ms
Aug 8, 202689 ms
Aug 15, 202688 ms
Aug 22, 202687 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202687 ms
Sep 12, 202688 ms
Sep 19, 202688 ms
Sep 26, 202687 ms
Oct 3, 202694 ms
Oct 10, 2026103 ms
Oct 17, 2026112 ms
Oct 24, 2026121 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of zusje.nl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. zusje.nl at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. zusje.nl at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. zusje.nl at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. zusje.nl at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. zusje.nl at 2.4 s2.4 s
  6. zusje.nl at 2.9 s2.9 s
  7. zusje.nl at 3.4 s3.4 s
  8. zusje.nl at 3.8 s3.8 s

Speed

10 to fix53
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.1 s · 607 KiB

    About 607 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.6 s · 1.9 MB

    4 images could be 1.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 123 KiB

    About 123 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 850 KiB

    50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (850 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 82). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, iubenda and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1,000 KiB and 620 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    650 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).

  • Google CDN adds 420 ms

    420 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 420 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 159 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 82 but mobile only 53. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify CSS

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 110 ms

    110 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 110 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.4 s

    19.4 s

    Your largest element takes 19.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.7 s

    19.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 32% slower for real visitors

    +32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 88 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 386 ms

    386 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 386 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 120 ms

    120 ms

    Real visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 643 ms

    643 ms

    Real visitors wait 643 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.026

    0.026

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.026, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix36
  • Page weight: 7.2 MB in 77 requests

    7.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.2 MB in 77 requests on a phone: images 4.3 MB (19), scripts 1.4 MB (30) and fonts 579 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images over 500 KB

    5 images weigh 2.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (3.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Tapasbon-1024x1024.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.05 g of CO₂e: 246.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9393
  • Hidden but focusable

    5 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 22 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9277
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 37 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 37 pages on zusje.nl and 5 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 30 characters

    Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “Zusje - Bourgondisch genieten…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://zusje.nl/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://zusje.nl/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (894 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://zusje.nl/llms.txt (3 KiB, 33 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 3 pages share a title

    /, https://zusje.nl/en and https://zusje.nl/de all use the title “Zusje - Bourgondisch genieten…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://zusje.nl/tapas-menu, https://zusje.nl/genieten-bij-zusje, https://zusje.nl/onze-zusjes, https://zusje.nl/winkel, https://zusje.nl/veelgestelde-vragen and https://zusje.nl/zusje-en-meer and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://zusje.nl/tapas-menu, whose canonical is https://zusje.nl/tapas-menu/menukaart. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://zusje.nl/en and https://zusje.nl/de have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://zusje.nl/winkel took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 8-field form

    Your longest form asks for 8 fields (1 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 276 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 276 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: iubenda

    A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zusje.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Headquarters
Uden

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on zusje.nl, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25