Website review, no card needed
applydigital.co website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202635 issues · 105 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on applydigital.co, 13 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 11.5 MB in 185 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 106 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 120 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.4 s
2.9 s
3.5 s
4.1 s
4.7 s
applydigital.co does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Vimeo and Google Fonts and others), adding 11.0 MB and 494 ms of main-thread time.
Vimeo adds 164 ms
164 msVimeo costs a phone 164 ms of main-thread work and 10.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 770 KiBAbout 770 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 60
60/100Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 61). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Main-thread work: 3.7 s
A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 330 ms
330 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 330 ms of main-thread work and 314 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 218 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 39 KiBAbout 39 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
96 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (96 KiB).
Improve image delivery
14 KiB1 image could be 14 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 188 ms
188 msYour server sent the HTML in 188 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.6 s
5.6 sReal visitors wait 5.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 16.1 s
16.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.3 s
9.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s
3.4 sThe first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sYour largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We and selected third parties use cookies or similar techno…”.
Largest content (LCP) got 25% slower for real visitors
+25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 5.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 463 ms
463 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 463 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 120 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 109 ms
109 msReal visitors wait 109 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.5 MB in 185 requests
11.5 MBYour homepage downloads 11.5 MB in 185 requests on a phone: other files 9.5 MB (39), scripts 1.6 MB (93) and images 191 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (20 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit
3.25 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.25 g of CO₂e: 390.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Summary elements must have discernible text (2 elements)
Summary elements must have discernible text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
10 links without text
10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 20 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
34 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 34 pages on applydigital.co and 5 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 148 characters
Your meta description is 148 characters: “APPLY designs, builds, and orchestrates ACx ecosystems for the world's most ambitious brands. Human depth at agentic sc…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “APPLY, Agentic Customer Experience”.
Title: 42 characters
Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “APPLY | Agentic Customer Experience Agency”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.applydigital.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.applydigital.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (395 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages without an H1
/work/industry-depth, /partners, /insights/learn/the-acx-report, /contact-us and /work have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages with very little text
/contact-us, /work and /events have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
2 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://applydigital.co goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (applydigital.com).
Valid certificate (163 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for applydigital.co and is valid for another 163 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://applydigital.co redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 23 links work
All 23 links checked from your homepage (19 internal, 4 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
applydigital.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
applydigital.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 22 years old
22 yearsapplydigital.com was registered in Sep 2004 through Tucows Domains Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Sep 2032
applydigital.com is registered until Sep 2032.
Content and conversion
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 362 words of copy
The homepage carries about 362 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Apply Digital Home page”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Apply Digital Home page”, “Contact us” and “Learn more”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and “100+ brands”.
Email authentication
No DMARC policy
applydigital.co has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.
Email authentication score: 50/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org include:spf.mailjet.com include:amazonses.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- SvelteKit
- Hosting
- AWS
Hiring
- Hiring
- 13 open roles
- Teams
- Product Management (4), Business Development (2), People & Culture (2), Technology (2)
- Job board
- lever
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on applydigital.co, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.