Website review, no card needed

applydigital.com logo

applydigital.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202633 issues · 104 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on applydigital.com, 12 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 11.5 MB in 187 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.3 s4.2 sMay 9Oct 244.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.5 s
May 16, 20264.5 s
May 23, 20264.5 s
May 30, 20264.8 s
Jun 6, 20264.9 s
Jun 13, 20265.2 s
Jun 20, 20265.1 s
Jun 27, 20265.8 s
Jul 4, 20265.6 s
Jul 11, 20265.9 s
Jul 18, 20265.9 s
Jul 25, 20265.3 s
Aug 1, 20265.2 s
Aug 8, 20265.6 s
Aug 15, 20265.9 s
Aug 22, 20265.5 s
Aug 29, 20266.0 s
Sep 5, 20265.9 s
Sep 12, 20265.9 s
Sep 19, 20266.0 s
Sep 26, 20265.8 s
Oct 3, 20265.9 s
Oct 10, 20265.6 s
Oct 17, 20265.8 s
Oct 24, 20264.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
149 ms82 msMay 9Oct 24107 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026113 ms
May 16, 2026106 ms
May 23, 2026101 ms
May 30, 2026100 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 202690 ms
Jun 20, 202697 ms
Jun 27, 2026105 ms
Jul 4, 2026109 ms
Jul 11, 2026112 ms
Jul 18, 2026119 ms
Jul 25, 2026109 ms
Aug 1, 2026105 ms
Aug 8, 2026112 ms
Aug 15, 2026119 ms
Aug 22, 2026132 ms
Aug 29, 2026139 ms
Sep 5, 2026141 ms
Sep 12, 2026139 ms
Sep 19, 2026139 ms
Sep 26, 2026132 ms
Oct 3, 2026127 ms
Oct 10, 2026123 ms
Oct 17, 2026120 ms
Oct 24, 2026107 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of applydigital.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. applydigital.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. applydigital.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. applydigital.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. applydigital.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. applydigital.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  6. applydigital.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  7. applydigital.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  8. applydigital.com at 3.9 s3.9 s

applydigital.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix76
  • Main-thread work: 4.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Vimeo and Google Fonts and others), adding 11.0 MB and 517 ms of main-thread time.

  • Vimeo adds 196 ms

    196 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 196 ms of main-thread work and 10.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 76

    76/100

    Your mobile performance score is 76. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    769 KiB

    About 769 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 320 ms

    320 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 320 ms of main-thread work and 313 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 252 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    96 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (96 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    59 KiB

    4 images could be 59 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    39 KiB

    About 39 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 39 ms

    39 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 39 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Real visitors wait 4.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.1 s

    16.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 649 ms

    649 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 649 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 107 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.5 s to 4.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Real visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.1 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “We and selected third parties use cookies or similar techno…”.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 11.5 MB in 187 requests

    11.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.5 MB in 187 requests on a phone: other files 9.5 MB (41), scripts 1.6 MB (93) and images 191 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (20 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.25 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.25 g of CO₂e: 390.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Summary elements must have discernible text (2 elements)

    Summary elements must have discernible text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 20 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9292
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 34 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 34 pages on applydigital.com and 5 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “APPLY designs, builds, and orchestrates ACx ecosystems for the world's most ambitious brands. Human depth at agentic sc…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “APPLY, Agentic Customer Experience”.

  • Title: 42 characters

    Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “APPLY | Agentic Customer Experience Agency”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.applydigital.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.applydigital.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (395 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 5 pages without an H1

    /work/industry-depth, /partners, /insights/learn/the-acx-report, /contact-us and /work have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    /contact-us, /work and /events have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5488
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 third-party cookies

    3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (applydigital.com).

  • Valid certificate (155 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for applydigital.com and is valid for another 155 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://applydigital.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 23 links work

    All 23 links checked from your homepage (19 internal, 4 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    applydigital.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    applydigital.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 22 years old

    22 years

    applydigital.com was registered in Sep 2004 through Tucows Domains Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Sep 2032

    applydigital.com is registered until Sep 2032.

Content and conversion

2 to fix80
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 362 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 362 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Apply Digital Home page”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Apply Digital Home page”, “Contact us” and “Learn more”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and “100+ brands”.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:9363808.spf01.hubspotemail.net include:mailgun.org ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
SvelteKit
Hosting
AWS

Hiring

Hiring
10 open roles
Teams
Business Development (2), Data (2), Experience Design (2), Product Management (2)
Job board
lever

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on applydigital.com, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25