Website review, no card needed
facctum.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202630 issues · 96 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on facctum.com, 10 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
86BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 183 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 190 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 202 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 200 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 192 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 165 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
5,671 HTML elements
The page has 5,671 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, framerusercontent.com and Hubspot and others), adding 4.4 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 73
73/100Your mobile performance score is 73 (desktop: 71). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 838 ms
838 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 838 ms of main-thread work and 933 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
819 KiBAbout 819 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
framerusercontent.com adds 444 ms
444 msframerusercontent.com costs a phone 444 ms of main-thread work and 3.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 226 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
140 KiB13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (140 KiB).
Improve image delivery
35 KiB3 images could be 35 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Reduce unused CSS
13 KiBAbout 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 42 ms
42 msYour server sent the HTML in 42 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 18.4 s
18.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 666 ms
666 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 666 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 809 ms
809 msReal visitors wait 809 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
40 images without width and height
40 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Speed Index: 5.1 s
5.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sYour largest element takes 2.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 183 ms to 165 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.074
0.074The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.074, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.6 MB in 144 requests
4.6 MBYour homepage downloads 4.6 MB in 144 requests on a phone: media 2.1 MB (12), scripts 1.7 MB (41) and images 382 KiB (50). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (82 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (103 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.30 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.30 g of CO₂e: 156.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
8 tap targets too small
8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
200 images without alt text
200 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (34 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 34 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“AML Screening Software for Real-Time Financial Cr…”, “AML Screening Software for Real-Time Financial Cr…” and “Screen customers, payments, transactions, and ale…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
161 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 161 pages on facctum.com and 14 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Enhance sanctions and watchlist screening with real-time, high-accuracy compliance technology. Reduce false positives a…”.
Title: 65 characters
Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Sanctions and Watchlist Screening | Real-Time Compliance Platform”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.facctum.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.facctum.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (6,295 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
13 small tap targets
13 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (facctum.com).
Valid certificate (73 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for facctum.com and is valid for another 73 days.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://facctum.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 34 links work
All 34 links checked from your homepage (31 internal, 3 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
facctum.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
facctum.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 5 years old
5 yearsfacctum.com was registered in Jul 2021 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jul 2031
facctum.com is registered until Jul 2031.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 907 words of copy
The homepage carries about 907 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Talk to our experts”.
13 calls to action
The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Talk to our experts”, “Request a Demo” and “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity and LinkedIn Insight.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:transmail.net.in include:146397009.spf01.hub…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
29 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- Framer e503c47
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 30 issues on facctum.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.