Website review, no card needed
fatiguescience.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202634 issues · 102 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on fatiguescience.com, 9 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among SaaS websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 93 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Improve image delivery
3.4 MB4 images could be 3.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
350 ms · 928 KiB86 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (928 KiB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Hubspot and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 61
61/100Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 509 KiBAbout 509 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 469 ms
469 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 469 ms of main-thread work and 643 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.7 s
A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 162 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
62 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 62 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 265 ms
265 msYour server sent the HTML in 265 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.8 s
12.8 sYour largest element takes 12.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Prevent Unsafe Driving and Safety Incidents with Readi®”.
Time to Interactive: 27.8 s
27.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.3 s
8.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 270 ms
270 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 270 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 95 ms
95 msReal visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 25% faster for real visitors
-25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 134 ms to 93 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005
0.005The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s
0.9 sThe first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.6 MB in 154 requests
5.6 MBYour homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 154 requests on a phone: images 3.6 MB (22), scripts 1.4 MB (49) and fonts 362 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
readiscore_circadian_square_padded.gif weighs 3.5 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image in older formats
1 image (3.5 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (3.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.59 g of CO₂e: 190.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 14 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 1 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (75 characters)
Your title is 75 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Fatigue Science | Readi Driver Fatigue Management Software for Safer Fleets”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Prevent Unsafe Driving and Safety Incidents with …” and “The Predictive Fatigue Technology for Safer Opera…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (198 characters)
Your meta description is 198 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
89 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 89 pages on fatiguescience.com and 9 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://fatiguescience.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://fatiguescience.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (827 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 small tap targets
2 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://fatiguescience.com/home?hsLang=en.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (fatiguescience.com).
Valid certificate (64 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for fatiguescience.com and is valid for another 64 days.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://fatiguescience.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 47 links work
All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
fatiguescience.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
fatiguescience.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 18 years old
18 yearsfatiguescience.com was registered in Dec 2007 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Dec 2033
fatiguescience.com is registered until Dec 2033.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 954 words of copy
The homepage carries about 954 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “DOWNLOAD GUIDE” and “BOOK A DEMO”.
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “DOWNLOAD GUIDE”, “Pricing” and “BOOK A DEMO”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 3 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be fatiguescience.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:20986175.spf05.hubspotemail.net -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google” and “k1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
15 cookies set on arrival
15Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
40 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 40 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- HubSpot
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- HubSpot
Hiring
- Hiring
- 2 open roles
- Teams
- Sales (1)
- Job board
- bamboohr
- Careers page
- fatiguescience.com/careers (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on fatiguescience.com, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.