Website review, no card needed

firstbase.io logo

firstbase.io website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202639 issues · 99 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on firstbase.io, 13 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.7 s2.9 sMay 2Oct 173.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.2 s
May 9, 20264.3 s
May 16, 20264.5 s
May 23, 20264.3 s
May 30, 20264.3 s
Jun 6, 20264.3 s
Jun 13, 20264.2 s
Jun 20, 20264.2 s
Jun 27, 20264.2 s
Jul 4, 20264.1 s
Jul 11, 20264.1 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.6 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.6 s
Aug 29, 20263.6 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Oct 17, 20263.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
479 ms104 msMay 2Oct 17163 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026396 ms
May 9, 2026384 ms
May 16, 2026354 ms
May 23, 2026425 ms
May 30, 2026435 ms
Jun 6, 2026436 ms
Jun 13, 2026426 ms
Jun 20, 2026416 ms
Jun 27, 2026406 ms
Jul 4, 2026379 ms
Jul 11, 2026365 ms
Jul 18, 2026317 ms
Jul 25, 2026260 ms
Aug 1, 2026216 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026150 ms
Aug 22, 2026164 ms
Aug 29, 2026172 ms
Sep 5, 2026175 ms
Sep 12, 2026187 ms
Sep 19, 2026196 ms
Sep 26, 2026210 ms
Oct 3, 2026207 ms
Oct 10, 2026184 ms
Oct 17, 2026163 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of firstbase.io (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. firstbase.io at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. firstbase.io at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. firstbase.io at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. firstbase.io at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. firstbase.io at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. firstbase.io at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. firstbase.io at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. firstbase.io at 4.6 s4.6 s

firstbase.io does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix61
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 s · 280 KiB

    About 280 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.4 MB

    14 images could be 2.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, website-files.com and cookiehub.eu and others), adding 4.2 MB and 877 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 61

    61/100

    Your mobile performance score is 61 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • website-files.com adds 213 ms

    213 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 213 ms of main-thread work and 3.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 462 ms

    462 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 462 ms of main-thread work and 541 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 71 KiB

    About 71 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 48 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (48 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 185 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.4 s

    11.4 s

    Your largest element takes 11.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The software platform for running your US business”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 52 images without width and height

    52 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Speed Index: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 141 ms

    141 ms

    Real visitors wait 141 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 56% faster for real visitors

    -56%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 396 ms to 163 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 192 ms

    192 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 192 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.052

    0.052

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.052, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.4 MB in 80 requests

    4.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 80 requests on a phone: images 3.3 MB (39), scripts 884 KiB (22) and stylesheets 90 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (36 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.23 g of CO₂e: 148.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8491
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 16 tap targets too small

    16 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (33 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 33 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 82 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9282
  • Title is long (81 characters)

    Your title is 81 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Firstbase | Incorporation, compliance, bookkeeping, and taxes – all in one place.”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 9 H1 headlines

    There are 9 <h1> headlines (“The software platform for running your US business”, “30,000+ companies started with Firstbase” and “Everything you need to start and run your busines…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 64 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 64 pages on firstbase.io and 19 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 149 characters

    Your meta description is 149 characters: “Firstbase helps anyone to build a US business. Start a company, set up banking, payments, and payroll, and manage a bus…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.firstbase.io/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.firstbase.io/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,119 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix70
  • 2 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to /sales-tax and /vc-database, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /pricing has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9276
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.net/action/0?ti=97010856&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=ec149161-c29c-4c7d-b2f0-7135f25bb830&bo=2&pi=918639831&lg=en-US&sw=390&sh=844&sc=24&nwd=1&tl=Firstbase%20%7C%20Incorporation,%20compliance.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'tagName')”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix88
  • 9 broken links to your own pages

    9 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://www.firstbase.io/sales-tax (404).

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://help.firstbase.io/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (firstbase.io).

  • Valid certificate (51 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for firstbase.io and is valid for another 51 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://firstbase.io redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

1 checks passed
  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only amazonaws.com, amazontrust.com, awstrust.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for firstbase.io, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 662 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 662 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more” and “Get Started”.

  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Start my business” and “Get Started”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 27 testimonial or review blocks, 38 customer or partner logos, 1 trust badge and “30,000+ companies”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Segment.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:trustpilotservice.com include:21376150.spf06.hubsp…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k1” and “default”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar | Segment

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 39 issues on firstbase.io, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25