Website review, no card needed

interactiveavenues.com logo

interactiveavenues.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202636 issues · 82 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on interactiveavenues.com, 14 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s1.2 sMay 9Oct 241.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
121 ms92 msMay 9Oct 24106 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202695 ms
May 16, 202698 ms
May 23, 2026103 ms
May 30, 2026104 ms
Jun 6, 2026105 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 2026102 ms
Jun 27, 2026100 ms
Jul 4, 2026100 ms
Jul 11, 2026100 ms
Jul 18, 202698 ms
Jul 25, 2026101 ms
Aug 1, 2026104 ms
Aug 8, 2026107 ms
Aug 15, 2026106 ms
Aug 22, 2026102 ms
Aug 29, 202699 ms
Sep 5, 2026101 ms
Sep 12, 2026104 ms
Sep 19, 2026106 ms
Sep 26, 2026115 ms
Oct 3, 2026116 ms
Oct 10, 2026118 ms
Oct 17, 2026116 ms
Oct 24, 2026106 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of interactiveavenues.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. interactiveavenues.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  2. interactiveavenues.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  3. interactiveavenues.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  4. interactiveavenues.com at 5.8 s5.8 s
  5. interactiveavenues.com at 7.3 s7.3 s
  6. interactiveavenues.com at 8.8 s8.8 s
  7. interactiveavenues.com at 10.2 s10.2 s
  8. interactiveavenues.com at 11.7 s11.7 s

Speed

5 to fix42
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Font display

    1.7 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.7 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 42

    42/100

    Your mobile performance score is 42. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    400 ms · 2.7 MB

    20 images could be 2.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    320 ms · 43 KiB

    About 43 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 320 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    160 ms · 23 KiB

    About 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    160 ms · 8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 86 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube and Google Fonts), adding 23 KiB and 8 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 222 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.996

    0.996

    The layout shifts by 0.996 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Your largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “India’s Most Sought-After Digital Agency”. Most of its time is element render delay (6.5 s).

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Real visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 692 ms

    692 ms

    Real visitors wait 692 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 36 ms

    36 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 36 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 8.1 MB in 91 requests

    8.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.1 MB in 91 requests on a phone: media 4.6 MB (1), images 3.1 MB (57) and scripts 149 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 2.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    1,002 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Updated.png at 1,080 px wide, shown at 300 px. Resized copies would save about 1,002 KiB.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (2.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (2.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.28 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.28 g of CO₂e: 273.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8290
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <marquee> elements are deprecated and must not be used (1 element)

    <marquee> elements are deprecated and must not be used: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 30 images without alt text

    30 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7582
  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“India’s Most Sought-After Digital Agency”, “Proudly Recognised as Agency of the Year” and “Great Place To Work®️ Certified™️ in India”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.interactiveavenues.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at interactiveavenues.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 38 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 38 pages on interactiveavenues.com and 15 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Interactive Avenues is India's largest full-service digital marketing agency, offering digital services to help busines…”.

  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Interactive Avenues: India's Leading Digital Marketing Agency”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.interactiveavenues.com/index.html.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.interactiveavenues.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (262 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.interactiveavenues.com/fraud-alert/index.html has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.interactiveavenues.com/our-crafts/index.html and https://www.interactiveavenues.com/our-crafts/commerce/index.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.interactiveavenues.com/work/index.html, whose canonical is https://www.interactiveavenues.com/works/index.html. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 8885
  • 16 small tap targets

    16 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Creating a worker from 'blob:https://www.interactiveavenues.com/5db08c8c-a7dc-438d-8651-3bfca104aad4' violates the foll…”.

  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 260 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 260 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 24 customer or partner logos, 11 trust badges and “200 + Active clients”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at interactiveavenues.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2023.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on interactiveavenues.com, including 10 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25