Website review, no card needed

inter.it logo

inter.it website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202634 issues · 80 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on inter.it, 17 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.1 s3.7 sMay 16Oct 314.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.8 s
May 23, 20263.9 s
May 30, 20263.9 s
Jun 6, 20264.0 s
Jun 13, 20264.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.9 s
Jun 27, 20263.9 s
Jul 4, 20263.9 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20264.0 s
Aug 8, 20264.0 s
Aug 15, 20264.1 s
Aug 22, 20264.1 s
Aug 29, 20264.0 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.9 s
Sep 19, 20263.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.9 s
Oct 3, 20264.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.9 s
Oct 17, 20264.0 s
Oct 24, 20263.9 s
Oct 31, 20264.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
524 ms245 msMay 16Oct 31456 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026402 ms
May 23, 2026366 ms
May 30, 2026351 ms
Jun 6, 2026315 ms
Jun 13, 2026277 ms
Jun 20, 2026315 ms
Jun 27, 2026335 ms
Jul 4, 2026363 ms
Jul 11, 2026375 ms
Jul 18, 2026355 ms
Jul 25, 2026329 ms
Aug 1, 2026328 ms
Aug 8, 2026329 ms
Aug 15, 2026339 ms
Aug 22, 2026371 ms
Aug 29, 2026387 ms
Sep 5, 2026425 ms
Sep 12, 2026440 ms
Sep 19, 2026448 ms
Sep 26, 2026465 ms
Oct 3, 2026477 ms
Oct 10, 2026492 ms
Oct 17, 2026476 ms
Oct 24, 2026478 ms
Oct 31, 2026456 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of inter.it (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. inter.it at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. inter.it at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. inter.it at 2.4 s2.4 s
  4. inter.it at 3.2 s3.2 s
  5. inter.it at 4.0 s4.0 s
  6. inter.it at 4.8 s4.8 s
  7. inter.it at 5.6 s5.6 s
  8. inter.it at 6.4 s6.4 s

Speed

12 to fix10
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.7 s · 1.3 MB

    About 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 10

    10/100

    Your mobile performance score is 10. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    950 ms · 641 KiB

    29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (641 KiB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and Usercentrics CMP and others), adding 1.9 MB and 858 ms of main-thread time.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 833 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 608 ms

    608 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 608 ms of main-thread work and 881 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 350 ms.

  • 2,224 HTML elements

    The page has 2,224 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 155 ms

    155 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 155 ms of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • bynder.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    bynder.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 357 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    86 KiB

    2 images could be 86 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    51 KiB

    About 51 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 16 ms

    16 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Real visitors wait 5.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 887 ms

    887 ms

    Real visitors wait 887 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.44

    0.44

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.44 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.6 s

    8.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.9 s

    18.9 s

    Your largest element takes 18.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “VARESE, ITALY - NOVEMBER 02: Francesco Pio Esposito of FC I…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.7 s

    25.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.409

    0.409

    The layout shifts by 0.409 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 22% slower for real visitors

    +22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 402 ms to 456 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 577 ms

    577 ms

    Real visitors wait 577 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.4 MB in 117 requests

    4.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 117 requests on a phone: scripts 2.6 MB (34), fonts 889 KiB (17) and images 512 KiB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.23 g of CO₂e: 148.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9693
  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 78 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 2 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 166 internal links, 43 external

    The homepage links to 166 pages on inter.it and 43 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 143 characters

    Your meta description is 143 characters: “News, video e aggiornamenti sul sito ufficiale dell'Inter - Scopri le notizie su squadra, società, interviste e le info…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “.css-17hjk85{display:inline-block;position:relative;overflow:hidden;word-break:break-word;opacity:0;padding-bottom:var(…”.

  • Title: 52 characters

    Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “FC Internazionale Milano - Sito Ufficiale | Inter.it”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.inter.it/it.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.inter.it/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.inter.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,164 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 117 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    155 of 160 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,301 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,301 words of visible text.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at inter.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
AWS

Company

Founded
1908
Headquarters
Milan

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on inter.it, including 23 speed issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25