Website review, no card needed
interactsoftware.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202631 issues · 79 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on interactsoftware.com, 10 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 209 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 212 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 209 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 291 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 558 KiBAbout 558 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.3 s31 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and Bing Ads and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
800 ms · 286 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (286 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 901 ms
901 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 901 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 50
50/100Your mobile performance score is 50. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 511 KiB19 images could be 511 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.7 s
A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,005 HTML elements
The page has 2,005 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 238 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Duplicated JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 34.1 s
34.1 sYour largest element takes 34.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 34.4 s
34.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 34.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.6 s
10.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 241 ms
241 msReal visitors wait 241 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 35% slower for real visitors
+35%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 209 ms to 291 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 25% slower for real visitors
+25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 969 ms
969 msReal visitors wait 969 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 519 ms
519 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 519 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 22.0 MB in 151 requests
22.0 MBYour homepage downloads 22.0 MB in 151 requests on a phone: media 10.4 MB (2), images 9.5 MB (47) and scripts 1.6 MB (39). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 8.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
6.3 MB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example solutions-promo.webp at 2,925 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 6.3 MB.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
pricing-promo.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (48 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 6.2 g of CO₂ per visit
6.22 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.22 g of CO₂e: 746.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Interactive controls must not be nested (5 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 68 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
134 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 134 pages on interactsoftware.com and 11 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 126 characters
Your meta description is 126 characters: “Deliver a better employee experience. The all-in-one EX, HR and internal comms platform trusted by 1,500+ customers wor…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “The AI-native modern intranet for enterprises”.
Title: 53 characters
Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Interact - The AI-native employee experience platform”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.interactsoftware.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://interactsoftware.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,277 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.interactsoftware.com/llms.txt (21 KiB, 29 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 92 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 873 words of copy
The homepage carries about 873 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book a demo” and “Watch demo”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Contact Us” and “Book a demo”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 23 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating, 4 trust badges and “2.7M patients”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at interactsoftware.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on interactsoftware.com, including 21 speed issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.